Of course, I was just stating interest. Just shoot me a PM whenever they roll in.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by dave
Cheers![popcorn]
Printable View
Of course, I was just stating interest. Just shoot me a PM whenever they roll in.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by dave
Cheers![popcorn]
Well aparanty we were misinformed. They are 5.6mm.:o
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/3992/p1015899.jpg
That's quite a kick up in the heat sinking, no?
Peace,
dave
Sure is. I am just now left wondering why the different lenses.:confused:
Maybe two things are going on here:
1) More heat sinking
2) Lenses that collect more of the light
This may be how they are getting the higher lumen rating from the same components. They are driving the diodes at a higher current (so more heat) and getting more of the light to the light path.
Did you measure the current?
Peace,
dave
im amazing at the size difference between the two.
if i get any different results from others ill post up if not i wont
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...0967Medium.jpg
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...0969Medium.jpg
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...0968Medium.jpg
Ill take four please ! Ya I wish.
IAttachment 25783
Have you measured the lens diameter and the lens projection from the heat sink on the new types, by any chance?
It's possible Casio decided to go for a slightly larger, longer FL lens to improve divergence. That would amp up the brightness particularly in the long throw models.
Its been about a month since the photos of the modules were posted. Has anyone tested the diodes yet.
^^^Yep and they seem like the same mixed bag you get with the A140 to me.;)