Printable View
Can anybody identify the very nice lens that is in those Melles modules that Laser Ben was selling a while back? It has a very short focal length, good AR coating. I'd like to find a comparable lens but I dont know where to look; suplus-shed has some good cheap optics but I dont know if I'm looking for a doublet, triplet, achromat, aspheric, etc.
Thanx!
-Steve
hi
i asked about those module on another thread so i have cut and pasted what pitbull thought,
Ok, they were very nice looking little modules that could clamp, focus and cool a diode, but I thought they had nothing more than a nice set of anamorphics in them for beam shaping?
hope that helps:)
These melles griot optically corrected modules are showing up on ebay for $100 each approx I have seen 3 this week.
frank next time you find one send me the link because i cant find any
thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by frank_1257
I keep spotting one at svcompucycle I do not like them but if you buy cheap why not if bad use pp protections what I have seen is a melles griot laser diode red I believe in a small housing they use a set of two anamorphic prisms to clean up the diode laser I am not sure how issues with changing wavelength would affect usage because of different diffraction through prisms. If nothing else you can see how melles griot can get the best possible spot out of a diode laser. The unit at svcompucycle for $99 uses this laser to form a front end assembly for a yag laser rail to incorporate an aiming diode laser it has a optic to combine the yag laser and aiming laser and you will see where the base footing attaches with 3 slots. If you want to find this and the other melles griot unit just do the kill em all approach start at svcompucycle and sister store supertechstore and search melles griot then just ebay search diode laser the other melles griot corrected diode lasers come in a wood box for an optical table and there is a nice small little red laser and two ? unknown other devices with it. Melles Griots website has some articles on how to anamorpically ( and other ways ) correct laser diodes and gives the math and lens parameters for some common uses. BTW we may not be on the same page I am assuming you are seeking to correct a diode laser output as best as can be possibly done , they wrote the book on doing this literally and probably have patented some methods for doing so. The us patent office might not be a bad place to look for how they have done their corrections collimation at uspto.comQuote:
Originally Posted by badger1666
Thanks for the info you-all! :)
I bought 2 of those modules from Laser Ben a while back and they work very well with some 7 x 39 degree 635nm 150 mW diodes that I have. The best so far. The beam is large at the aperature (not acceptible for small high speed galvo mirrors,) but for lower speed larger mirror outdoor beamshows they're great!! Yes, the modules contain one lens and an anamorphic prism pair.
The reason that I was asking about the lens itself was that it alone does a terrific job of collecting almost all of the light from the (very divergent) diode and puts it into a well collimated beam (almost don't need the prism pair) but with the prisms, makes a perfect beam (for me anyway;)) I was just wondering how to calculate the lens properties to figure out an acceptible alternative/ replacement (I need 2 more of these lenses)
I saw the one(s) in the wooden box on ebay .. I dont know what exactly they're selling there; looks like maybe 1 module and 2 lens assy's but I dont have 100+ bucks to spare at the moment,.. just trying to figure things out for future use..
I'm still trying to get my head around the optics.. the beam comes out as a vertical stripe, after the lens a focused smaller vertical stripe, then at a distance a focused horizontal stripe (without the prisms) . With the prisms, of course, it's circularized. They put the stripe into the prisms 90 degrees opposite of what I've been trying to do -to 'squash' down the fast axis.. Guess I'll get it figured out eventually. Some of those optical equations I've seen are just Greek to me :rolleyes:. lol.
Thanks again,
-S
Specifying Laser Diode Optics
The growing number of laser diodes in use has focused attention on the design of the optics for this type of device. Understanding the special characteristics of diode radiation, including beam divergence and angular asymmetry, is fundamental to practical design. However, the size, weight, and cost of the optical elements must also be considered.
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode1.gif
Special characteristics of diode radiation must be accommodated by the optics. This diagram shows the divergent laser output first collimated, then converted from elliptical to circular cross section (in the anamorphic prism pair), expanded, and focused to a small spot.</SPAN> Laser diodes have many advantages: they are small and can be directly modulated, and the power requirements are modest. Their use is increasing, and they are expected to replace gas lasers in many applications. Compared with other lasers, however, the output radiation from laser diodes is highly divergent. As a result, the use of a laser diode, whether in a new application or as a replacement for another laser, usually requires that some sort of collimating or refocusing optics be specified.
This article will acquaint readers with the types of optical systems needed for various laser diode applications and show how a realistic set of specifications can be developed. We begin with a brief review of laser-diode operating principles and show how laser-diode construction gives rise to the unusual output characteristics. Next, we shall examine some specific collimating and focusing systems; special attention will be paid to the way in which each specification affects the complexity and, ultimately, the cost of the optics.
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode2.gif FIGURE 1. Typical double-heterostructure laser diode
Laser-diode operation
A schematic of the essential elements in an injection laser diode is shown in Figure 1. The active medium, where lasing occurs, is sandwiched between two cladding layers of both higher bandgap and lower refractive index. This structure is on an appropriate substrate; a contact layer to facilitate electrical connection is deposited on top of the stack. In operation, the p-n junction is forward biased; this causes holes and electrons to be injected from the cladding layer into the active region, where they are confined by the energy barrier between adjacent layers. Carrier recombination in the active region produces light, which is confined to this region by the surrounding regions of lower index. A photon produced by recombination can cause other carriers to recombine and emit photons coherent with the first (stimulated emission); as current increases in the active region, the gain due to stimulated emission eventually exceeds the intrinsic losses in the cavity due to absorption, and the device lases. Mirror facets at the ends of the cavity provide optical feedback, the other critical element needed to make the device a laser.(l)
Laser diodes can be divided into two generic types depending on the method of confinement of the lasing mode in the lateral direction. Gain-guided laser diodes work by controlling the width of the drive-current distribution; this limits the area in which lasing action can occur. Because of different confinement mechanisms in the lateral and vertical directions, the emitted wavefront from these devices has a different curvature in the two perpendicular directions. This astigmatism in the output beam is one of the unique properties of laser-diode sources. Gain-guided injection laser diodes usually emit multiple longitudinal modes and sometimes multiple transverse modes. The optical spectrum of these devices ranges up to about 2 nm in width limiting their coherence length. This feature limits the ability to collimate or refocus emitted light to the diffraction limit. Damage at the output facet is directly related to the optical power density there; gain-guided lasers typically have spots of several micrometers at their output faces and are therefore capable of producing continuous wavepower in the tens-of-milliwatts range.
Index-guided laser diodes use refractive index steps to confine the lasing mode in both the transverse and vertical directions, so that these lasers are free of astigmatism. Index guiding also generally leads to both single transverse-mode and single longitudinal-mode behavior. Typical linewidths are on the order of 0.01 nm. The spot size at the output facet is typically a couple of micrometers, limiting the amount of power available from these devices to about 15 mW or less. Recent developments, such as large-optical-cavity (LOC) and non-absorbing-mirror (NAM) devices have allowed an increase in the lasing spot size without sacrificing single-mode characteristics. These techniques have pushed output power past 20 mW continuous wave, while maintaining reliability and lifetime.(2) Because many of the applications involving injection laser diodes require essentially diffraction-limited performance at several milliwatts of power, development of these types of sources is an important step in diode technology.
A feature common to all laser diodes is asymmetric output: the beam divergence is different in the planes parallel and perpendicular to the emitting junction. Because of diffraction, the narrower vertical dimension of the output facet causes greater beam divergence than in the transverse direction. Ratios between the angles typically range from 2:1 to 6:1.
The output from most diodes being manufactured today falls in the wavelength range between 780 and 905 nm or in the range between 1.2 and 1.7 µm. The longer-wavelength range has been developed to take advantage of the high optical-fiber transmission and low dispersion achievable at these wavelengths, so that these devices are used mostly in telecommunications.(3) Shorter wavelengths are desirable whenever spot size or beam divergence needs to be kept to a minimum, since diffraction increases linearly with wavelength. This is a consideration in applications such as optical recording, laser printing, and laser alignment. Also the greater availability of detectors for the visible and near infrared makes short-wavelength sources attractive. Research into laser diodes that emit in the visible spectrum is very active at present.
CORRECTING FOR ASTIGMATISM
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode3.gif
Collimating optics
Because the highly divergent output of the injection laser diode is difficult to work with, the first task usually facing the designer of a laser-diode-based system is specification of collimating optics. Performance of the collimator determines spot size, beam divergence, resolution, etc. of the rest of the system, so it is imperative that the collimator quality be sufficient. On the other hand, to limit the cost of the optics, excessively stringent performance requirements should be avoided. Many possible applications for injection laser diodes currently use helium-neon or other gas lasers. It would be expeditious to use as much of existing optical designs as possible, so in these cases we would like our laser-diode source to mimic the characteristics of a gas laser; this means a small-diameter beam with diffraction limited collimation quality. Once achieved, this package can be inserted into a pre-existing optical system, which may have to be reoptimized for the new wavelength and beam diameter. Typical situations where this might occur are in laser printers, barcode scanners, or laser measurement and alignment systems.
In designing a high-quality collimator for laser-diode sources the first consideration is collection angle, or numerical aperture. Numerical aperture is the sine of the half angle of collection. Divergence angles for laser diodes in the direction perpendicular to the junction range as high as 60 degrees FWHM (full width at half maximum), typical values are in the 40 degree to 60 degree range. For a beam with a Gaussian intensity profile, the 1/e2 irradiance point would be about 1.7 times the FWHM value, and our collimator should be designed to collect a cone with this angular diameter. The designer of a laser-diode collimating lens must balance numerical aperture (collection angle) against focal length, working distance and output beam diameter. As an example, suppose we had a laser-diode source with a FWHM in the perpendicular direction of 50 degrees, and we wanted to collimate to a beam with a 1-mm diameter at the 1/e2 point. We would want our collimator to have a numerical aperture of sine(1.7 x 50/2) or 0.676. Since the output beam radius equals the numerical aperture of the lens times the focal length, we would need a lens of 0.74-mm focal length to accomplish this. To design a lens with such a short focal length, and still maintain a reasonable working distance, would be fairly complicated. To maintain a working distance of at least 1 mm for a source with such a large divergence angle, we need to use focal lengths in the range of 4 to 8 mm. Using a lens of 6-mm focal length would give a collimated beam about 8 mm in diameter. Once collimated to this size, the beam can easily be de-expanded by means of conventional optics such as doublets and singlets if a smaller beam diameter is desired.
One important reason for maintaining a reasonable working distance is that many of the laser diodes currently available have a coverglass over the package. Coverglasses are typically 0.17-mm to 0.30-mm thick and are usually spaced anywhere from 0.7 to 1.5 mm from the emitting surface of the laser diode. Obviously, the imposition of a coverglass limits mechanical access to the laser diode and dictates a certain minimum working distance. The other major factor introduced by a coverglass is wavefront aberration. A plane parallel plate introduces spherical aberration into a diverging beam, so if diffraction-limited collimation is desired, this effect must be compensated in the collimating optics. In Figure 2 the wavefront distortion introduced by a window is plotted as a function of window thickness, for specified values of refractive index; and numerical aperture. As can be seen, the index; of refraction (window material) is relatively unimportant; for collimators with a numerical aperture of 0.3 or less, the effect of a window, unless very thick, will introduce less than 1/10 of a wave aberration and can usually be ignored.
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode4.gif
FIGURE 2. Effect of a window on wavefront distortion at wavelength 830 nm. Numerical aperature (NA) and refractive index (n) are listed.
In general, the design of a diffraction-limited laser-diode collimating objective should correct for spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, and spherochromatism. Chromatic aberration and field curvature can usually be ignored. Correction for spherical aberration is essential for good performance on-axis, while correction for coma and astigmatism allows for some tolerance in the positioning of the diode relative to the lens. Ignoring field curvature allows for greater correction of the other off-axis aberrations; the effect of field curvature can be compensated by adjusting the focus of the collimating system. Single-mode injection laser diodes are essentially monochromatic sources, and therefore no correction for chromatic aberration is needed. However, there may be batch-to-batch wavelength differences in laser diodes or temperature-dependent wavelength changes that necessitate correction for spherical aberration over a certain wavelength range.
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode6.gif
FIGURE 3. Design of collimating optics with focal length 6.5 mm and numerical aperture 0.62.
Figure 3 shows the design of a 6.5-mm focal length, 0.62-numerical aperture collimating lens; the working distance for this design is 1.21 mm. The lens consists of a cemented doublet followed by two singlets, the last of which is a thick plano-convex lens. This particular lens form allows as great as possible a working distance for such a high numerical aperture. Using a plano-convex lens as the final element provides some economy in manufacture, since flat surfaces require no special tooling, and there is no limit to the number of lenses that can be processed at once; but the main advantage of this lens form is that it makes correction for a coverglass particularly easy.
To compensate for the presence of a coverglass on the diode, we simply change the thickness of the final element; no other changes in radius or thickness are needed. To first approximation, the amount of thickness to be removed from the final element is simply the thickness of the coverglass itself. Furthermore, removing this material increases the working distance; all that is necessary is that the distance from the laser diode surface to the inside of the coverglass, plus the distance from the outside of the coverglass to the rear lens element, be the same as the original working distance (before modification). As a result of this feature, a single collimator design can be used for a variety of different diodes and configurations with only one simple modification, namely the thickness of the final element.
If system design or diode specifications change after the original design has been completed and built, retooling is not needed to take changes into account. Even existing lenses can easily be retrofitted to work under the new conditions, if necessary. From the point of view of a lens supplier, one basic design can be used to satisfy a wide range of customer requirements, finished elements can be kept on the shelf, and only polishing of the final plano side of one element is needed to complete a collimator that will be tailored for the customer's exact configuration.(5)
Objective lenses for optical recording
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/diode7.gif
FIGURE 4. Design for a videodisc objective with focal length 8.0 mm and numerical aperture 0.50.
One application for injection laser diodes is in laser-videodisc and optical data-storage systems. The primary concerns in designing focusing objectives for these recording applications are spot size and working distance. Storage capacity is directly related to the size of the "pits" on the disc surface. Since longer wavelength means a larger focused spot, these systems typically use the shortest-wavelength laser diodes commonly available -- currently about 780 nm. With this wavelength and an objective in the 0.45 to 0.50 numerical-aperture range, submicrometer-sized pits can be formed on the disc surface. Figure 4 shows one possible design for a videodisc objective; it is an 8-mm focal length, 0.50 numerical aperture lens with a working distance of 1.56 mm. This lens embodies several essential features we would want to include in any recording objective. Notice that it has only three elements; weight is a concern since the lens assembly must be mounted on a voice coil and moved axially to correct for focus errors caused by movements of the disc surface. To correct for movement of the disc in the perpendicular direction during playback, the lens must be designed to work well over a small field of view, usually about 80 µm in diameter. There is no significant degradation in spot size for this lens over this range. As in the case of the collimator, field curvature correction is unnecessary, since the focus servo can correct for movement in the axial direction. Correction for spherochromatism is important because of possible diode-to-diode wave-length variations mentioned before.
The rear element of this lens is a plane parallel plate. Once again, the use of plane surfaces allows for economy during manufacture and simplifies correction for the presence of a disc. As before, an amount of material approximately equal to the thickness of the disc is removed from the final element to correct for the aberrative effects of the disc. Since the plate is 4-mm thick in this design we can easily accommodate the standard 1.2-mm disc, or a thicker disc if required. This one design can be readily adapted to a variety of conditions by the lens manufacturer or easily modified by a user to accommodate changes in disc specifications.
Because the linewidth single-mode lasers is so narrow, they have a long coherence length; light reflected by the disc that re-enters the laser can cause feedback problems and output power instability. One solution to this is to build an optical isolator using a polarizer and a quarter-wave plate. Another solution is to use a multi-mode gain-guided laser, which emits over a wavelength range of about 4 nm. If this type of source is used it will also be necessary to introduce some correction for chromatic aberration. A good rule to use is that the secondary spectrum of the lens should be less than the depth of field; an estimate of useful depth of field is given by
http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/equat1.gif
where 2Z is the total depth of field.(6) For http://www.mellesgriot.com/images/sci1.gif=780 nm and a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.50, we get a depth of field of 1.6 µm. The collimator we have discussed has a focal-length variation of about 2.5 mm over a 4-nm range, so it would require some additional color correction and the addition of more elements, to work optimally under these conditions.
continued next post
Focusing lenses for fiber optics
A typical application in the fiberoptics/telecommunications field might be focusing already collimated light into a fiberoptic cable. This situation might arise in a system that uses wavelength multiplexing or requires sampling of the beam. Because of the working-distance restrictions on collimators already mentioned, it is desirable to collimate first, and then insert any beamsplitters or other components into the collimated beam. This light then needs to be refocused into the fiber core. Typical single-mode-fiber core diameters range from 2 to 8 µm, with numerical apertures of 0.12 or less, and multimode fibers have core dimensions of 50 µm upwards, with typical numerical apertures of about 0.25 to 0.50.(7) These combinations of spot size and numerical aperture make this application much less demanding than the videodisc focusing objective. At wavelengths above1.3 µm, the availability of higher-index materials such as silicon open up the possibility of using single-element focusing lenses, even for single-mode applications. As an example, consider a single-mode fiber for 1.55-µm wavelength with a core diameter of 6 µm and a numerical aperture of 0.12. At this wavelength and numerical aperture the diffraction-limited spot size is about 8 µm; this is absolutely the best that can be achieved. This can easily be accomplished with a single meniscus lens made of silicon. Because of its higher index of refraction, silicon can provide a higher level of correction per element than optical glass. Using glass, a two-element system would be needed to match the performance of the silicon singlet just mentioned.
The relatively large core diameters of multi-mode fibers make coupling collimated light into them fairly easy. Even though the numerical apertures of most multimode fibers are much larger than in the single-mode case, the lens systems for this application do not need to be even remotely diffraction limited. In general, two elements are the most that are needed to focus into a multimode fiber, and in many cases a singlet suffices (this assumes diffraction-limited input collimation). One exception might be the situation in which two or more wavelengths must simultaneously be coupled into the fiber.
http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/laserpic/dps80-6.jpg
This info is all intellectual property of melles griot inc., and this last picture from a sam's laser faq's collection of small dpss laser interiors
Thanks, Frank, Good info. (I have read some of that before).
Actually I neet to match a lens ( a single lens- possibly a triplet or GRIN) not a lens combination as pictured. The FL=1-2mm , the Dia is about 7mm, the the lens thickness is about 8 mm; although it could be a lens combo, I dont know the NA and I cannot remove it from the housing to see if it is one lens or a combo. I was just wondering if anyone here had one of those modules and had any info on that particular lens. The prism pair is easily identifiable and re-creatable though, it's the lens that I was questioning if anyone had the specifications, or better a P/N.
Thanks.
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by steve-o
Some of these companies have proven less than helpfull to me in the past in particular newport optics, but calling them all in rapid succession would have to shed some light on your determing that lenses parameters, although it might require sheer black boxing of the lens or lens combo. In otherwords presenting a light source with known beam characteristics and determining the result of passing through the unknown lenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve-o
Re: Greek..
Yep, that's the shit I run up against everytime I try to go in deep into optics.
Well, anyway, I drew up a diagram of the lens and it's optical properties when a LD beam is shot thru it.. thought I saved it in .jpg.. lost it all... ahh well... will try again later I guess.. it's gettin' late.. zzzzzzzzz.. --
Yeah I called Newport once and mispronounced Fresnel Lens bout laughed me out of my chair nice um assinine folks I have been finding WONDERFUL article on collimating optics and launching into and out of fibers at a place called ozoptics.com I have run across the docs randomly in goggle searches. There is a lot to be said for searching the uspatent office uspto.com for patents on methods to correct astigmatism in diode lasers. hell find someone with some lasers and take the patent numbers and search them, I have had hell with lack of adobe flashplayer, quicktime( and associated TIFF file integral plugin support for IE7 x64), java, etc support on my X64 computer someone in fact, was it you? that turned me onto using google patents , that was very cool.Quote:
Originally Posted by steve-o
I dont think that was me.. I dont think I've ever used the google patent thing. I'll give it a try.
I 've gone to the uspto site a few times, not for laser collimation tho..
I just recently learned that fresnel was pronounced frrr-nel, I used to say frez-nell. lol. :) I think that's right..(?) I may have to look it up to make sure..
I like the idea of using fiber-optic cable for collimation but it's so critical to get the end polished right and the cable diameter etc i dont think that I could do it. I now have a few ball lenses, I may try it again..
Think I'll go check out ozoptics.com ... Thanks Frank!
Hup!! Got a response from Melles! It's a multi-element (like Frank_1257 pictured,) and its $240usd :eek: from Melles-G. Ive seen surplus for $90 tho (w/o AR coating) . The p/n if anyone's interested is 06GLC002/D.
It's an awesome lens assy for LD collimation imho.
Um, Steve, start from the beginning again for me... Is this the answer to al our 635nm problems? :confused:
Hey, Aaron,
It is for me, 'cause I've got those 636nm diodes with 7 x 39 degree divergence. These lenses tame them down to good specs while capturing almost (if not all) the LD light output. It's no good for small galvo mirrors though because the output is too large; 5 x 8 mm (or 1 x 8 w/o the prism pair) at the lens aperature. Of course, without the prisms, you get a line at a distance instead of a dot. So, no, not the answer to the big 635 question... I wish it was ;).