Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: The need continues....red lasing.....

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI.
    Posts
    2,704

    Default

    The best "Bang For Your Buck" I can see right now is the 642nm 5.6 cans at 150mW or the 550nm C-mount diodes @ 1W although we are talking a 200X1um emitter. We just may have to wait for technology to progress on this one. Hey! Maybe someone can go work for Casio and convince them to come out with 24 1W 642nm diodes for their newest projector!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default

    http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...ighlight=636nm

    best bang for bucks is the open can diodes 815 its only £3. the 150mw 642nm is £120
    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    I have to agree with 300evil, 150mW 640nm is the best bang for the buck, of you go the 655nm you need double the hardware to get to the same result.

    Double the hardware = extra driver, collimator, mount, mirror, mirror mount etc. this is more expensive than a 640nm diode.

    Al we need to do is a groupbuy of 640nm diode to get the price low.

    I heard rumors of 150mW 640nm far below the 100 euro, but you need quantities.

    On PL only people bought more than 250 445nm diode. to balance a 445nm diode you need minimum 4x 150mW. So PL needs 1000 640nm diodes to go with the 250 445nm diodes.

    I'm sure we can get a hell of a deal if we can reach the 1000pcs.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave View Post
    And its just a bare chip, not a can..
    Ah OK, couldn't quite see that from the spec sheet. It does look they have, or are working on a 500mW diode in the ML5xx71 range for mini-beamer applications.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MechEng3 View Post
    No...I have had the 635 stuff... it would be nice to get at a source of diodes only...of a better beam data...like 650 or 660nm. If it has a beam that is resonably tamed without spend 4 times the diode cost in optics...might go with that. That was the point. Guess I should have been more clear on what I had in mind......have not gotten over being spoiled by the price of blue.
    Its not 635 its multiwatt 642 in the projector.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Southport, UK
    Posts
    2,746

    Default

    Has anybody costed the 637nm 170mW diodes yet?
    http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/3985/laser.gif

    Doc's website

    The Health and Safety Act 1971

    Recklessly interfering with Darwin’s natural selection process, thereby extending the life cycle of dim-witted ignorami; thus perpetuating and magnifying the danger to us all, by enabling them to breed and walk amongst us, our children and loved ones.





  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default

    yep read that posted i linked to

    £270
    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Thumbs up

    ...............

    Love, peace, and grease,

    allthat... aka: aaron@pangolin

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default

    if only there was a private section on PL im sure more people would more info and designs
    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,009

    Default

    yes andy, everybody knows you made a knife edging setup and you don't want to post it because of arctos ...

    but that's not really what this thread is about

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •