Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: 445nm diode with beam correction optics (anamorphic prism pair)

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zoof View Post
    Is there any particular reason why cylindrical lenses should work better than a prism pair?
    I read that a few times already but I would be interested in knowing a little more background.
    Prism pairs gives a much higher loss compared to cylindrical lenses.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mccarrot View Post
    Prism pairs gives a much higher loss compared to cylindrical lenses.
    How come? In principle there shouldn't be any difference. Perhaps in practice because practically all anamorphic prisms are made of SF11 (*) which has high loss below 450nm (thanks Andy who pointed this out). That's why I am looking into custom ones out made of BK7 plus coatings. A group buy seems worthwhile but I am not tempted to get into this mess, perhaps somebody else?

    Note added: I just played with prisms coated for 532nm, and at 532nm they have 3% loss, but like 30% loss at 445nm.

    Note added2: (*) SF11 because of the high index of refraction. Recall that the magnification is given by M=2n (where n=index of refraction), when one chooses incidence under the Brewster angle. For SF11, n=1.8 and M=3.6 roughly. For other angles (ie, different magnifications), the sloped sides need to be coated for the wavelength in question, in order to avoid considerable loss. This means that for a magnification suitable for the blue diodes, which is like 4 or 5, in connection with low-loss glass like BK7, one necessarily needs proper coatings.
    Last edited by RedlumX; 06-17-2010 at 07:43. Reason: notes added

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    449

    Default

    With a prism pair, it's two optics. With a cylindrical lens, it's one optic. Two optics generally have higher losses than one optic

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xytrell View Post
    With a prism pair, it's two optics. With a cylindrical lens, it's one optic. Two optics generally have higher losses than one optic
    you need 2 cylindrical lenses, you use them like telescope.

    to make a prism setup you have to shoot the beam at a angle at the prism, this will give you bigger loss, and the glass of a prism pair is thicker.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    glass itself should not be a loss, for what I know it's the interface between two optical mediums which gives losses

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bend Oregon USA
    Posts
    3,350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    glass itself should not be a loss, for what I know it's the interface between two optical mediums which gives losses

    you can expect a 4% per surface loss on all un coated glass at normal incidence on average across the visible spectrum (most people know, but i wanted to put the number there)
    Pat B

    laserman532 on ebay

    Been there, done that, got the t-shirt & selling it in a garage sale.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shrad View Post
    glass itself should not be a loss, for what I know it's the interface between two optical mediums which gives losses
    Right, so it is a matter of the coating, be it prisms or cylinder lenses, and in each case you have two times two interfaces.

    Well everyone must come to his/her conclusions about what to do. Good luck setting up a crossed pair of cylinder lenses ;-)

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vezon, Belgium
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    I find mounted prism pairs to be much easier, as no alignment is needed expect putting the pair right in front of the beam

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    Some losses can be minimized by ensuring the first prism face is at the brewster angle for the wavelength in question.. You can find this by trial and error if you're using pre-mounted prisms.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Nice setup shrad,
    i dont have one of these 445 diodes, so my observation of whats happening might not be relevant.
    But what i've noticed when placing a 473nm dpss (closest wavelength i have to 445) through the prism pair is loss due to reflection caused by the angles involved. not necessarily losses through the glass itself.
    getting away from these angles is impossible, someone might be able to tweak them for best performance, but there will always be losses due to the angles of the prisms.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •