what you showed is a full telescopic system, so maybe there was some misunderstanding![]()
what you showed is a full telescopic system, so maybe there was some misunderstanding![]()
Hehe funny how the truth is always catching up![]()
The same company makes one AR coated for 405-445 as well.
Other lenses can give more power though, as these are 3 element.
http://aixiz.com/store/product_info....roducts_id=140
(you would have to email them to see if it's the 405-445)
here is a thread about it:
http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...ad.php?t=11675
There are other lenses like lens27, but I haven't used them,
so I can't comment on those.
naaaah, i need the one red-coated you had, because i WANT to loose power!
Here is the red lens with diode mounting cylinder:
CLICK
Note that even the blu-ray aixiz lenses loose at least 25% of the diode power, but the red lenses loose more.
sorry I was away.
The beam is a little smaller than the size of a pencil when it comes out of the telescope. The expander is 2x. I actually did this just for fun. I was suprised that it worked. I also loose a ton of power doing it. I bet some of the beam is clipped in the telescope.
PS: I dropped the 660nm diodes and went 642nm. Much nicer colors and much brighter. Will be interesting to see what my quad does when loaded with 4 150mw 642nm diodes. I might need that blue power back!
I did as suggested try the beam at about 120 feet that is about as far as I can go. Its about 1 inch wide by 5-6 inches long. Still works for beam shows ok. As I said for my use in my house my solution works for me. I'm just sharing. Do what you will with it.
Last edited by kecked; 07-20-2010 at 13:03.
With that measurement, the beam has about 3.74mrad divergence. You could probably get it close to 1mrad if you re-adjusted the system for far field focus instead of focus at 20 feet. But, you are clipping at the first lens, and again at the expander so losses are nearing 50%.