Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: ML520G72 diode properties

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flecom View Post
    would you get less clipping from the prisms?

    how about the 250mW 642nm diodes?
    the clipping is happening because the na of the collimator is not up to the task, so a prism wouldn't make a difference. I think Simon P1t8ull tested the 250mw 642nm a while back and got pretty poor results.
    KVANT Australian projector sales
    https://www.facebook.com/kvantaus/

    Lasershowparts- Laser Parts at great prices
    https://www.facebook.com/lasershowparts/

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    I have a couple of the Mitsubishi ML520G51's here which are the 150mW/640nm small emitter diodes with 7/40 degrees divergence. I tried various FL collimators from 3.6mm to 8mm on the diode with a set of prisms and also found the beam wasn't all that great with any of them. With prisms the losses were unacceptably high due to the severe angles needed to get the beam under any form of control as well, so no good IMHO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •