Mmmmmm ???
I am waiting for my lenses from the Doctor....But....I was under the impression that DETAIL information would be included on EXACT positioning. To me...." Detailed " means a few basic dimensioned CAD drawings....like side elevation. plan view, Etc !!!!
What information was included with the lenses ?????
In closing....Mike....if YOU are having problems.....with your knowledge and tallents....MMMMMMMM ?????? I am....concerned.
CDBEAM(Bob)
Originally Posted by
MechEng3
Is it just me or am I having a bad time with these lenses? I must admit that I have cobbled some things in a quick test setup...even resorting to micro positioners to hold them...but I can in no way get a decent near field spot under 6mm or better if you count the fringe ring impingements. What collimator was used in initial testing?? Roitner, O-like, Aixiz???? I can not get any cooperation from these....at least near to where the beam won't miss the scanners.....??????? Ready to give up on this project.
Beam Axiom #1 ~The Quantum well is DEEP ! Photons for ALL !!
.
Beam Axiom #2 ~Yes...As a matter of fact...I DO wear tinfoil on my head !!
.
Beam Axiom #3 ~Whe'n dout...Po ah Donk awn et !!
.
Beam Axiom #4 ~A Chicken in every Pot, and a Laser Lumia in every Livingroom !!
.
Beam Axiom #5 ~"Abstract Photonic Expressionism"....is "Abstractonimical" !!
.
Beam Axiom #6 ~ "A Posse ad Essea" ~ From being possible to being actual ...is the beam target !