(Dons dog bite suit)
Personally I think this is a great idea that is doomed to fail for one simple reason:
There is not always a *right* answer for three reasons:
1) There are multiple right answers some of which are proprietary to the companies or individuals who came up with them
2) Sometimes the right answer depends on who you ask such as variations in enforcement from one EOS to another... from one CDRH staffer to another...
3) Sometimes there simply is no answer because the CDRH has refused to rule on the issue.
So what happens? Bickering and/or endless disagreement with no hope of resolution.
Remember you can do anything you want as long as CDRH approves of it or declines to disapprove it which means that there are multiple ways to approach radiation safety and many of them exist only within a complex framework that is not easily or properly communicated in this forum.
That, and I guess there is another reason which is that when I or someone in a similar position respond and say "hey you can't do that" we going to get jumped on for a commercial interest bias.
There is a reason that the entry barriers are high in this business.