Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Creme of the Crop 445nm Diodes

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    UCSB
    Posts
    715

    Default

    I didn't realize that there was quite that large a difference in luminous efficiency at 440 vs 450nm, I will work in adding wavelength sensing to the rig and hopefully will be able to bin the next lot of diodes I test by efficacy. The data should be available early next year.

    In the mean time, these diodes are going fast, down to 5 of them left
    Last edited by krazer; 12-20-2010 at 21:55. Reason: updated diode availability

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Flying over a town near you
    Posts
    1,404

    Default

    I never realized the wavelength could shift so far with the same wafer design. I guess the cleaving is done in a rushed status...revealing the new oddity and not so close tolerances held on the final product. Nice that you are doing so much research....Thank you for sharing information with us. Still pondering decanning one and applying different optics to see what can be done...I guess no one has fiber launched one yet? I have the micro lens for the diode's window if anyone want to harvest it. I dropped the one I tried to remove. It is still MIA somewhere on the table.
    You are the only one that can make your dreams come true....and the only one that can stop them...A.M. Dietrich

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    @ solar flare
    445 nm 0.0424000 0.0433000 0.0441000 0.0450000 0.0459000
    0.0433 / 0.0424 = 1.02 therefore 446 appears 2% more bright than 445.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Zweibrücken, Germany
    Posts
    605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -bart- View Post
    @ solar flare


    0.0433 / 0.0424 = 1.02 therefore 446 appears 2% more bright than 445.
    Unless you have other information, light intensity to the human eye has to be viewed over the entire spectrum of visible light in order to determine a percentage level within a part of this spectrum. The chart below shows this perception of light intensity in dependence to wavelength. Going from 555nm (100% borderline) to 380nm (0% borderline) the spectrum of 440nm to 450nm takes up 0.86% of the perceivable intensity level of the human eye, making it hard to impossible to differentiate. But I do stand to be corrected.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Intensity.jpg 
Views:	160 
Size:	48.9 KB 
ID:	22487

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    This (medialas?) table does not state photopic-, scotopic- or mesopic vision, but I assume this table to be photopic. That makes it not particular usefull.
    For lasershows mesopic conditions are most common. To make matters worse, the mesopic peak shifts with lighting conditions.

    Nonetheless, I think the whole point of the above table is to calculate relative brightness in photopic vision, (what else?)
    1 watt of 445nm will resemble 42,4mW of 555nm.
    1 watt of 446nm will resemble 43,3mW of 555nm.
    Therefore I conclude a 2% increase of perceived brightness.

    Looking at various graphs I think the increase in perceived brightness under mesopic condition will be even higher.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •