The minimum post length is just plain dumb, with people posting "16 characters" or images of Dysney Characters to over come the limitation, so it is pointless IMHO.
The minimum post length is just plain dumb, with people posting "16 characters" or images of Dysney Characters to over come the limitation, so it is pointless IMHO.
This space for rent.
+1
*Bollocks!!*
- There is no such word as "can't" -
- 60% of the time it works every time -
+ 2
Doc's website
The Health and Safety Act 1971
Recklessly interfering with Darwin’s natural selection process, thereby extending the life cycle of dim-witted ignorami; thus perpetuating and magnifying the danger to us all, by enabling them to breed and walk amongst us, our children and loved ones.
+ 3
Eat Sleep Lase Repeat
+4 +4 _4 +4 _+4
You need to be clever to see my vote.
I'm not clever.
I just used my X-Ray vision !
I say keep it, it makes for some interesting humour
I'd say a post should at least contain:
one numeric
five bytes of porn
2,5μCi of Polonium 210
some fairy dust
and a pinch of salt.
Last edited by -bart-; 01-07-2011 at 09:13.
Totally agree.
blah, blah, blah
Whoa... Most rules are put in place for a good reason; I am sure the Man upstairs.... with with the Broom, has a good reason for the character limit and I doubt it is a stupid reason. I know he does but I don't remember what post it was stated in.
I got an idea; remove the character limit for the users with paid subscriptions. Maybe more people will subscribe.
Love, peace, and grease,
allthat... aka: aaron@pangolin