Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Dichroic filters question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default Dichroic filters question

    I am building my own RGB projector and am looking for some dichroic filters,

    I stumbled upon these from LENOPTEC (anyone heared of them?)



    pass BLUE, reflect green and red OOPS I WAS WRONG: it must be REFLECTS BLUE, passes green and red
    LINK with specs


    AND

    pass RED, reflect green and blue
    OOPS I WAS WRONG: it must be REFLECTS RED, passes green and blue
    LINK with specs



    Would they suit my needs if I eg would mount them on a MM1 and position them @45°?

    Thank you in advance

    B
    Last edited by Ideas; 01-23-2011 at 14:45. Reason: mis interpretation of the graphs

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    there are a few things i dont get, maybe it is just me

    1. the mm1 does not have a hole in the middle, are you going to mount the dichro sticking out from one side for the most part? maybe the mm2 with an 1 inch hole would suit you better

    2. can you describe the placement of your lasers? is the red going to be further from the galvos or the closest one? and still, it looks to me that one of the two does not suit you

    you need one that passes red and reflects green and another one that reflects blue and passes red and green


    or, on a different setup one that passes green and reflects blue and another that passes green and blue and reflects red

    depends on what laser you choose to be your "guideline"
    "its called character briggs..."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,497

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Ideas View Post
    Would they suit my needs if I eg would mount them on a MM1 and position them @45°?
    Depending on the order of your lasers in the beam path and the layout of your projector, yes, they would work. How are the prices? (Typically dichros sell for $35 each.)
    Quote Originally Posted by LaNeK779 View Post
    the mm1 does not have a hole in the middle, are you going to mount the dichro sticking out from one side for the most part?
    This is actually a common arrangement. It looks funny, but it works just fine. I agree that using the larger MM2 with a hole in the center looks better, but it's also more expensive.

    Adam

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    mr buffo, can you double check the dichro selection? i think the ones posted will not do it for him
    "its called character briggs..."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Thanx for the help already!
    PS thank you for pointing that out, I see it now that I have a transmission problem after my first blend as part of the blend is reflected by the second dichro.. hmm I should go looking after a second dichro that lets me pass a broader spectrum and only reflects one primary color instead of two..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    exactly!!

    you can also check online stores from members here, they do carry good quality dichros (much better than the 95% you got)
    "its called character briggs..."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,497

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by LaNeK779 View Post
    mr buffo, can you double check the dichro selection? i think the ones posted will not do it for him
    If I'm reading the graph correctly, the first one transmits green and red, and reflects blue, while the second one transmits blue and green, and reflects red.

    In that case, he can go with the standard layout - green, then mix in red (using the second dichro), and finally mix in blue (using the first dichro).

    This assumes that T-ave refers to transmission efficiency on the graphs provided.

    If they are reversed (that is, T-ave is actually reflectance, which would be very weird), then you'd put red first and use the second dicrho to add in green. Then for the blue you'd have to reflect the red and green off the first dichro while allowing the blue to pass through, which would complicate the optical layout a bit. (It adds a 90 degree turn to the beam path.) But it would still work.

    Truthfully though, it would be best to design your optical layout first, and then buy the dichros you need, rather than buying the dichros and then trying to make your layout match the dichros you bought...

    Adam

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    1,930

    Default

    well, something does not check out

    either the graphs are weird, or the description Ideas gave is wrong

    i also see in the graphs that the first one passes green and red and the second passes blue and green. but we don't know the behaviour of the second dihcro @ 445
    "its called character briggs..."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the hills
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by buffo View Post

    Truthfully though, it would be best to design your optical layout first, and then buy the dichros you need, rather than buying the dichros and then trying to make your layout match the dichros you bought...
    I concur. I have a set of dichros that was bought before the lasers. They *will* work, but not as well as they should knowing the light sources I have now. They can be used for a different purpose, but it was money spent without a purpose.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •