Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Efficiency of a Tricho ?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    802

    Default

    Kewl ..Sounds like what Im seeing here as well

    I have two different sizes of Fuji's here
    The tiny one that I got from Spec is 10mm by 12mm on each of the RGB faces
    It has less loss but very small.


    The larger one pulled from a Sony Betacam is 18mm by 22mm output face
    aprox 22mm .. larger and easier to use.

    The HUGE one pulled from an RCA film chain is too big to use and extremly lossy..Its justa show piece.



    The smaller one has less loss , however I dont remember just how much less


    Still..All very usable..
    "My signature has been taken, so Insert another here"
    http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/laserfaq.htm
    *^_^* aka PhiloUHF

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,459

    Default

    Wow! That last trichro you've got is friggin' *huge*!

    Can't imagine what a laserist would use that for... Maybe if you had to combine a few *really* high power lasers and you were worried about blasting the AR coatings off, you could enlarge the beam diameters first, then pass them through the trichro, and then shrink the white light beam back down again... But that seems like way too much work.

    As you said - it's better as a show-piece. Or a door-stop!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •