Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Dirt cheap low noise remote microposition controller.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default Dirt cheap low noise remote microposition controller.

    I was disassembling an old pinboard for a new circuit, and noted the existing layout to save it. I thought it might be useful to someone here, so here it is...

    This is a dirt-cheap and effective low noise microposition controller based on an LM317T regulator configured for adjustable constant voltage output. It can be useful for remote control of fine focus and many other things, adjusting right down to near zero volts. Accuracy, drift and repeatability depend mostly on the mechanics used, as will linearity. While it probably won't do for finished designs, it should be ideal for simple projects and testing stuff.

    (Schematic made in Courier New font, size 10, Windows ANSI coding.)


    Code:
                 ||          D1   D2
         -------|  LM317 T  |----x---|>|--|>|---x------
                |___________|                        
                             R1                     
         x      ------x--/\/\/\--!       ------x      x
                 VR1                     R2   
                Z     __C1               Z     __C2
         x      Z<-                      Z             x
               Z                     Z          
               --!                                 
         !------x------x------------------x------x------!
    
    
                  VR1     10K Lin
                  R1      2K2
                  R2      10K
                  D1,D2   1N4001
                  C1      47 Tantalum
                  C2      1000F Electrolytic
    Input +12 VDC.
    Output, 5 watt mylar speaker or similar (better) actuator.
    If using a mylar speaker, bond the magnet's back to a metal chassis for cooling, this is critical for neodymium magnets. Also heatsink the LM317T with 10C/W or less.


    VR1 sets position, with C1 to reduce noise from VR1.
    R2 and C2 prevent shocks to the mechanism if fast changes occur on VR1.
    D1 and D2 keep the output pin voltage at least two diode drops above ground, which allows the output drive to be varied close to zero.

    If you like it, tell others; if you don't, tell me. :twisted:


    Edit:
    Is constant VOLTAGE, not current, as I first wrote, I got confused with a variant I was going to try, and didn't. A variable current source that can go to zero, be linear, and not fry the potentiometer IS possible, using a similar parts list to this circuit, but the config is not the same. It uses a floating voltage reference to bias the ajust pin, and maybe the two diode drops will serve, but you'd probably need better accuracy.

    The circuit above is ideal if you've got a constant load though, where voltage control is enough.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,488,547

    Default

    Thanks for the tip! Also, thanks for posting it here at PL before posting it in alt.lsers. (Makes me feel special!)

    Just kidding - with all the brewhaha over the PL post on alt.lasers, I figured a little humor was in order.

    Off topic, but why didn't you keep the "lostgallifreyan" nick when you registered here?

    Adam

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Good question. Not sure.. I think it's mainly cos I used The_Doctor on the Music-Reviewed forum and others before it. Lostgallifreyan isn't easily shortened either, as Skywise noted on alt.lasers...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    802

    Default

    Hey Crow... Nice circuit

    That is very similar to a motor driver I built some years back !!!
    I think it was for the lissajou generators we built for a while.
    3 of these circuits and three small motors with mirrors attached
    perpendicular to the shaft.

    The good 'ol 317.. it's a great device, Almost can do anything
    Of course It wont drive diodes very well on its own,,..
    You'd still need a dropping resistor..

    As for constant current source..even around half an amp
    I still had to play with several low value resistors ...juggling
    to get what I needed... but it worked.
    Using the diodes as the current sense resistor will give funny results
    as they change resistance with load...
    Even a temperature change will change the output..

    Good for general use..Altho I prefer Op-Amps.
    Better control and all..
    But still.. that circuit is easy to construct and do many things

    Anyone think about using these for controlling seleniods for shutters?

    OBTW, I know where Gallifrey is..hehe

    --chuck
    "My signature has been taken, so Insert another here"
    http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/laserfaq.htm
    *^_^* aka PhiloUHF

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    I love op-amps. I'll be putting up a circuit using a couple of them soon, for the Scientech 360001 to Voltmeter with differentiator response acceleration, if I can make it work well.

    Diodes change with load, true, but that circuit is for constant load. While it might be hard to predict with easy rigour where a value will be, it should be close enough, and it should stay put.

    I wouldn't use it to drive diodes. But I might use this:

    Code:
                 ||         R1
         -------|  LM317 T  |----/\/\/\----x----x------
                |___________|                        
                                                    
         x             !------------                 x
                                     VR1      __C1
                             ----/\/\/\----x
         x               R2       D1   D2          x
               ---/\/\/\---x---|<|--|<|---!          
                                                     
         !------x--------------------------------x------!
    
    
                  VR1     10K Lin
                  R1      1R 2W
                  R2      10K
                  D1,D2   1N4148
                  C1      1000F Electrolytic
    That's the current controlled equivalent. I haven't built it to try it, so the resistances VR1 and R2 are only starting estimates. It should be good for 0 to 1.25 amps. If it works. I found the original version too. It's in the LaserFAQ, posted by Winfield Hill. He specifies a 1.23V bandgap reference and a low current source in place of D1,D2 and R2, but I think the simplest form will often work, at least as well as the voltage form I posted earlier.

    Actually, I prefer to tweak LM317 diode drives as you do, by juggling fixed resistances in constant current config, adding or subtracting half-ohm resistors.

    About the LM317, I think it's maybe the greatest single IC ever made. I've seen amazing circuits built around it. I even saw a high(ish) power radio transmitter once. Not working, but a ham radio guy built it, and I saw the design he posted online. I can't remember the URL though, I saved a few things once..

    One feature of all the circuits I'll post, anywhere, is extreme low cost and part count. It's like the equivalent of machine code, or Haikus, or maybe a martial art move. I like the effort and the final simplicity that comes when it's perfect. It's also the right thing to come from someone with lots of time but little money...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    802

    Default

    Hey Crow ,..I hadnt tried that one yet

    I'll give that one a go... next time I'm breadboarding a 317
    it'l be interesting to see what happends...
    I'm always interested in ways circuits handle temperature changes as well !!!

    Yeah I like simple circuits as well, less parts to go bad..
    Sometimes easier to troubleshoot too !!

    Hey, If anyone here sees these circuits and tries to use them for driving diodes
    Please be very careful..
    You will need to experiment with component values quite a bit..
    Could be fun tho !!!
    "My signature has been taken, so Insert another here"
    http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/laserfaq.htm
    *^_^* aka PhiloUHF

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Oh, it's definitely NOT diode-ready...

    There are several protections missing, apart from it being risky, variable. Should be fixed current with temperature compensation if needed, and have some capacitors across the LD and a fast diode in inverse parallel with it too. And maybe a series 2 ohm resistor after the current sense resistance too, before anything reaches the LD and other protection stuff.

    The main point of these circuits is they can be adapted easily to micropositioning tasks that normally cost a lot more to solve.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    802

    Default

    yeap...True..

    This is for other stuff other than for diodes.. I got in a hurry in that post.
    I had to leave.


    I really think Im gonna try it on some seleniods !!!
    Thanks for posting it Crow
    "My signature has been taken, so Insert another here"
    http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/laserfaq.htm
    *^_^* aka PhiloUHF

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •