Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Measuring a Laser for SLM - Suggestions Please

  1. #11
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    9,905

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jem View Post
    Thanks for the offer Steve, it's much appreciated. However, I think this project is beyond my skill level, besides it looks like it's only any use for HeNe's - correct?

    I'm sure something will eventually become available 'off the shelf'
    The problem is you need to change mirror sets for each wavelength, unless you want to buy a super expensive mirror set. I have 550$ in the required set in year 2000 dollars.

    If you could find two Omnichrome 632 mixed gas high reflectors at 99.9% or better, you'd be all set for 430 to say 670 nm.

    The reflectance of the mirror determines the FP finesse which is the resolution. Anything less then 98% reflective is not worth messing with. So your restricted to dielectric mirrors. The curvature is important too, You can do it with flats, but the required alignment is a pain in the A$$, so you can do Fabry-Perot and have cheap and great resolution, or do Michelson and have inexpensive, but pain in the butt to build over long distances.

    Most people replace the mirrors on with a "V" folded mirror pair or a retroreflector for long distances to reduce alignment problems on the Michelsons.

    The old saying cheap, accurate, or easy to build, pick any one or two, applies.

    Steve

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,585

    Default

    Hi Steve

    Read it and (pretty much) understood it all

    Idea is now firmly placed on the back shelf... For now

    Thanks for your explanations, as I said before, much appreciated.

    Jem
    Quote: "There is a theory which states that if ever, for any reason, anyone discovers what exactly the Universe is for and why it is here it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another that states that this has already happened.”... Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001

  3. #13
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    9,905

    Default

    Easy test, shoot gratings. The better the diffraction, the better the coherence, and you only need 2 mirrors or one of these things:

    http://www.delphiglass.com/annual-be...vel-box-of-100


    The 4 bevels form a nice cross grating if you flood it with a diverging lens. Easy way to measure the coherence distance.

    Steve

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    129

    Default

    I forgot to mention, I have listed some infos here:

    http://redlum.xohp.pagesperso-orange...asers.html#SLM

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    4,585

    Default

    Thanks, interesting stuff
    Quote: "There is a theory which states that if ever, for any reason, anyone discovers what exactly the Universe is for and why it is here it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another that states that this has already happened.”... Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Default

    RedlumX,
    Quote Originally Posted by RedlumX View Post
    I forgot to mention, I have listed some infos here:

    http://redlum.xohp.pagesperso-orange...asers.html#SLM
    Nice summary.
    Regarding the Fizeau interferometer, you state this:
    This method does not work for lasers with longer resonators (longer than the thickness of the plate, roughly)
    Will this interferometer still work for ECDL setups with cavities of a few centimeters?


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv View Post
    Will this interferometer still work for ECDL setups with cavities of a few centimeters?
    Hi Roy,

    in fact, as a matter of observation, it does.

    Recall that an ECDL is a complicated system from the resonator point of view. There are two relevant scales, the size of the diode and the size of the extended cavity. In a sense these form two coupled resonators and the combined effect is some complicated superposition of the modes; this is a bit similar to a conventional resonator with an extra etalon. However an ECDL also has an grating which even more complicates matters. So it's hard to tell beforehand what the resulting laser spectrum would look like.

    But I noticed that mode jumps in an ECDL are quite large, and their spacing seems to be determined by the size of the chip and not of the external cavity; so the jumps can be resolved by a thin (ca 1mm) glass plate interferometer. However I don't know whether this is generally true or not, so far all lasers I investigated behaved in this way.

    The movie which is displayed on this page is for an ECDL with a HL6385 diode, and you see very clearly that the jumps displayed on the spectum analyzer are visible in the interferometer as well.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Default

    RedlumX,

    In your movie the fringes are only crisp when the OSA shows the laser to be in SLM. Are the fringes always blurred with the laser in MLM? Why I ask is because I think that with a Michelson interferometer you can get fringes even though the laser is in MLM, but when you move one of the arms you see that the coherence length is very short, like a few millimeters. But, I guess this is only the case when the spectrum is composed of a few well separated spikes. Your movie clearly shows that when the spectrum is broad with overlapping spikes, the fringes are blurred. Or is the spectrum "hill" on the OSA just a lack of resolution?

    So, will the Fizeau interferometer show MLM behavior or only mode hops? I mean, if you switch on the ECDL and see crisp fringes, can you tell whether the output is SLM or MLM without changing the driver current or diode temp?

    Here is a nice MIT movie of a HeNe with single or multi line spectrum in a Michelson interferometer and an SFPI (27MB).

    Here are lots of interesting video demonstrations on lasers and optics from MIT.


  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv View Post
    In your movie the fringes are only crisp when the OSA shows the laser to be in SLM. Are the fringes always blurred with the laser in MLM?
    Essentially yes, but things are more complicated. For example, if the laser has two modes, one at 99% strength, say, the other at 1%, then there will be only a slight blurring. In a hologram you may get a slight banding then, or if there are many weak side modes, a slight loss of contrast; perhaps noticeable, perhaps not. So this is a gradual issue. In fact, many diodes will run weak side modes, and to what extend they are harmful, well, I don't know a good rule of thumb. I would say if the interferometric fringes blur noticeably, you'd see this in terms of a diminished contrast of a hologram as well.

    Moreover, even sharp fringes do not exclude multimode behavior. See below (*).

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv View Post
    Why I ask is because I think that with a Michelson interferometer you can get fringes even though the laser is in MLM, but when you move one of the arms you see that the coherence length is very short, like a few millimeters.
    Yes, if the two path lenghts of the interfering beams are equal, there will always be fringes. Therefore they should not be made equal. For the glass plate interferometer, where the two beams come from reflections of the front and back side of the plate, the path difference is 1mm or so. So it can detect only coherence lengths of less than one mm; which is relevant for diodes. It is useless for other lasers where the "worst case" coherence length is more than a 1mm.

    Let me remind you that if there are two isolated modes of equal strength, then there is a periodic structure. That is, if you change one of the paths, then the fringes will blur and after a while become sharp again; and this repeats indefinitely (similar for several modes). So when you see a sharp fringe pattern, you actually cannot exclude that there are several modes, if the path lenghts of the interferometer are by accident such that that the fringes happen "to be sharp again". This is what I meant above (*). This would be a rare accident and I never noticed this to happen. The strict way to exclude this would be to check the fringes for different path lengths, but I guess the effort wouldn't be worthwhile.

    These matters had been discussed already a few times in the holography forum (where this thread would actually belong). See also here, esp look carefully at the figure.
    http://www.holowiki.com/index.php?ti...herence_Length


    Quote Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv View Post
    Or is the spectrum "hill" on the OSA just a lack of resolution?
    Yes, it was set low.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv View Post
    So, will the Fizeau interferometer show MLM behavior or only mode hops? I mean, if you switch on the ECDL and see crisp fringes, can you tell whether the output is SLM or MLM without changing the driver current or diode temp?
    If the fringes blur much, you can tell immediately that there is strong MLM behavior. If the fringes are just very slightly blurred, it may be hard to tell by naked eye. Then the hologram my suffer from slightly reduced contrast.

    The only completely safe way to tell is to use a high resolution scanning interferometer, which can detect line widths of a few Mhs, or coherence lengths of tens of meters.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    84

    Default

    RedlumX,

    Thanks for the explanation. So, if I understand you correctly, when the diode (even as an ECDL) is in MLM the coherence length is always shorter than the plate thickness (due to the short diode cavity), and therefore there will be a blurring of the fringes. The blurriness strength is dependent on the strength of the side modes.
    Last edited by Roy G. Biv; 04-22-2011 at 15:59.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •