Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 88

Thread: Mitsubishi ML501P73 500mW 638

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swamidog View Post
    i think you're being way too optimistic.
    I think it's interesting to hear all the solutions from people who are trying to get the best lasers possible for show use. It's always possible to go the easy route (quad or 8x LPC826) anyway.

    Those Mitsubishi diodes are 500mW with a huge emitter. If you were to stack them into a quad next to each other and PBS them with another quad, you can get a square, 4W beam out of it.

    Now that beam is going to be a huge flashlight since you've essentially stacked an image of big emitters together, and the laws of physics say there's nothing you can do about that. The only thing we can do to tighten the beam is reduce the size of the image -- effectively chopping the edges off the beam to make it round and concentrate the power in the center.

    This would imply shooting the whole lot through a circular aperture after it's been collimated. Yes, that means losses, but you'd have those losses anyway if half of your flashlight spills over the galvo mirrors. I'd personally be more happy with a tight 1-2W of 638 coming from the same assembly (which would be about $700 worth of diodes, plus mounts and the lot, still coming in at about $1/mW) than a 4W flashlight which is worthless half the time.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MI, flint, farmington hills
    Posts
    569

    Default

    My gut feeling is that with the chopping of the beam plus a prism pair the beam would be usable for scanning.
    I would love someone who has these tools to do the testing but im getting them soon.
    not to bad only a 300$ for possible high powered decent beam 640.
    if this works out even if i use high loss optics i should still get 300mw and if i use good optics and push the diode a bit i should get from 450 to maybe 600mw (pushing it more than a bit to get that high tho)

  3. #63
    swamidog's Avatar
    swamidog is online now Jr. Woodchuckington Janitor III, Esq.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    santa fe, nm
    Posts
    1,545,810

    Default

    i have experimented with these diodes and a prism pair. at *extreme* correction, i managed to get a spot that was 1"x.3" at 40'.

    i did not measure the beam size exiting the prism, but it was fairly large and there was a lot of loss from the prisms.

    in theory you could prism correct two beams, then pass them both through a cube and then a pinhole filter to trim the cross into a splotch. you will then have to worry about fitting the beam on your scanners and matching the goofy divergence of your beam to the other lasers in your rig.

    i did this with two 445's and it worked really well, but the emitter size and the divergence of the 445's is smaller than those red fire hoses.

    i don't want to tell you you're wrong because:

    1) i'd like you to learn why it doesn't work.
    2) i'd like you to make it work then teach all of us.

    ii'm hoping for option 2.

    c.



    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    My gut feeling is that with the chopping of the beam plus a prism pair the beam would be usable for scanning.
    I would love someone who has these tools to do the testing but im getting them soon.
    not to bad only a 300$ for possible high powered decent beam 640.
    if this works out even if i use high loss optics i should still get 300mw and if i use good optics and push the diode a bit i should get from 450 to maybe 600mw (pushing it more than a bit to get that high tho)
    suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    my 2x 650's PBS'd make a giant +, it works fine for beam shows and ok for graphics, its like theres many choices

    and as far as 4x 826 setups, my 2W of 650 isn't that bright... so I'm guessing 1W of 660 is going to be pretty dim... only once I add in 1.2W of 642 is the red kind of bright...

    if you want crap tons of red you have to accept that either

    1) its going to cost a crap ton of money
    2) its going to be a flashlight

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiyoukan View Post
    My gut feeling is that with the chopping of the beam plus a prism pair the beam would be usable for scanning
    That depends on your definition of usable. Recently steve-o managed to get a beam from a 250mW Opnext HL6388MG diode down to 9x4mm and just over 1.1mR here but losses are quite high at 35mW through a single prism.
    So if Steve cut/folded/combined his beam to get about a 4.5 x 4mm beam with about 1.1mR, hopefully that would still be producing something over 200mW after optical losses.

    The thing is, that HL6388 diode has a 20x1µm emitter, which is half the size of this P73 series diodes wide stripe emitter of 40µm.

    Quote Originally Posted by flecom View Post
    if you want crap tons of red you have to accept that either

    1) its going to cost a crap ton of money
    2) its going to be a flashlight
    Or source some HL63133DG diodes along with the other parts you can't make, and put it together yourself.
    A little bit werrrr, a little bit weyyyyyy, a little bit arrrrgggghhh

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p1t8ull View Post
    Or source some HL63133DG diodes along with the other parts you can't make, and put it together yourself.
    Yep, that may be the way to go seeing as how it is single-mode and typ I= 250mA but according to the spec sheet could be pushed to max 320mA which might result in close to 200mW output at the expense of mttf. Not knowing the emitter size off-hand, it might be easier to tame too .. experiments need to be done

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by p1t8ull View Post
    Or source some HL63133DG diodes along with the other parts you can't make, and put it together yourself.
    that would meet #1?

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Herts, UK
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flecom View Post
    that would meet #1?
    I'm not saying you can homebrew a watt of bright red with a nice beam for under $200 (bring that day on ) but depending how resourceful and capable at manufacturing you are, versus the best deal you can get from a distributor for a complete module.. you should be able to save somewhere between a few and many beer tokens.
    A little bit werrrr, a little bit weyyyyyy, a little bit arrrrgggghhh

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    I like beer tokens. What are they worth in megaWatts?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    London or Spain depending on the weather
    Posts
    1,390

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	thinking2.gif 
Views:	81 
Size:	2.3 KB 
ID:	27425 What's all this about homebrews and tokens
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	drunk.gif 
Views:	80 
Size:	5.6 KB 
ID:	27423

    Cheers Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cheersbeer.gif 
Views:	81 
Size:	1,023 Bytes 
ID:	27424

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •