i have experimented with these diodes and a prism pair. at *extreme* correction, i managed to get a spot that was 1"x.3" at 40'.
i did not measure the beam size exiting the prism, but it was fairly large and there was a lot of loss from the prisms.
in theory you could prism correct two beams, then pass them both through a cube and then a pinhole filter to trim the cross into a splotch. you will then have to worry about fitting the beam on your scanners and matching the goofy divergence of your beam to the other lasers in your rig.
i did this with two 445's and it worked really well, but the emitter size and the divergence of the 445's is smaller than those red fire hoses.
i don't want to tell you you're wrong because:
1) i'd like you to learn why it doesn't work.
2) i'd like you to make it work then teach all of us.
ii'm hoping for option 2.
c.

Originally Posted by
kiyoukan
My gut feeling is that with the chopping of the beam plus a prism pair the beam would be usable for scanning.
I would love someone who has these tools to do the testing but im getting them soon.
not to bad only a 300$ for possible high powered decent beam 640.
if this works out even if i use high loss optics i should still get 300mw and if i use good optics and push the diode a bit i should get from 450 to maybe 600mw (pushing it more than a bit to get that high tho)
suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.