this laser is designed to be pumped CW, according to sam's laser faq
and another thing is the Cr4+:YAG is not inside the cavity, if the mirrors are coated on the crystal
that's the main reason I was puzzled about its use
and for alignment, I don't think it is such critical as the Cr4+ is mounted on the lid, in fact glued to a bolt which is bolted to a part of the beamlock outside (the lid is sandwiched between the beamlock and the Cr4+ base, which is itself bolted to a tube passing through the lid)
I still think the Cr4+ orientation is important, as it is placed at brewster angle and the polarization plane of the laser should be aligned... I tried by rotating/bolting the assembly more or less till I observed peak power on a piece of paper
another thing, the collimating lens was placed against the crystal, but that led to at least 15% of the beam dispersed AROUND the Cr4+, which is not really optimal I think, so I readjusted for approx. 15% free Cr4+ area around the beam, passing from 4mrad average to 2mrad average divergence (if that makes sense for you, I'm not native english so please be kind)
the cavity is really nice, but there are massive flows due to niche market and commercial pressure I think... focal point not into the crystal for the output of the GRIN, crystal was offset left to the point that the beam was slightly cut off by the mount, and overall alignment was a bit poor (cavity mount tilted approx 15° from parallel axe), not to mention no laser diode beam correction at all, leading to poor pump efficiency and losses at GRIN aperture