I want to echo what Steve said. I know all that Barney went through to prove his concept. The actual rotation of the prism took some daunting engineering. He finally resorted to having a custom, PLL motor engineered by a PHD engineering professor on the East Coast. This is one reason I'm interested in seeing "the bearings." I know Barney tried all sorts of drive arrangements and ultimately the only thing that worked was the hollow rotor method driving the prism directly. I suppose some modern commercial motor like the one pictured could be used.
Attachment 31283
Unfortunately, from my research, it seems this technology got scrapped in the liquidation of his laser estate. That isn't to say it can't be reproduced.
And as stated, it's not a simple matter of lining things up and lighting things up ... synchronization is VERY critical ... and the system has to be extremely robust given the speeds, and torque required. The apparatus can end up being quite bulky.
Beyond the mechanics of the rotation of the prism, I want to emphasize again that the other key component to the system was the variable diffusion. This could be done quite well today if we actually had a digital beam brush on the market. I know Bill was working on one in 2009 ... what ever happened to that?
As you may have figured out by now, I am a purest. I wouldn't undertake making this "Music Visualizer" again strictly as a cool effect. This was a deep intellectual endeavor for Barney in his life-long passion to visualize music. If I were in the position to, I would pick up his baton and finish his race for him.