Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Live SpaceX rocket launch in one hour

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The Woods, CA, USA
    Posts
    534

    Thumbs up Live SpaceX rocket launch in one hour

    SpaceX is doing a live broadcast of a night time launch from the USA today. Can watch the live stream over at http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/status.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    SoCal / San Salvador / NY
    Posts
    4,018

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Picasso View Post
    SpaceX is doing a live broadcast..
    Success! Very-cool, thx fer the linkky..

    fyi, for others, http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/falcon9.html - http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/dragon.html ..pretty-rad...

    ..can't wait till we can all 'be Major Tom', someday..
    j
    ....and armed only with his trusty 21 Zorgawatt KTiOPO4...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,533

    Default

    Unfortunately, not a 100% successful mission. The private satellite didn't make it to the proper orbit because one of the engines failed during launch.

    Still, at least the ISS will get it's cargo, and the rocket survived an engine failure without blowing up, so that's a huge plus. All in all, a good day for private space launches, but not a great day, sadly.

    Adam

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The Woods, CA, USA
    Posts
    534

    Default

    The Orbcomm satellite failed to make orbit because of NASA/RUSSIAN rules about restarting the 2nd stage after a fault of the first stage. SpaceX could have restarted second stage to boost and release the sat but rules are rules I guess.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    The Orbcomm satellite failed to make orbit because of NASA/RUSSIAN rules about restarting the 2nd stage after a fault of the first stage.
    If that is true and the flight is un-maned then to what point? What would be the downside of restarting other than causing the mission to fail for a different reason? Or were there other reasons? I hope it was not due to the fear that the failure needed to be due to less spectacular causes than an engine failure and so a possible salvage of the mission took a back seat to publicity.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The Woods, CA, USA
    Posts
    534

    Default

    If the first stage fault damaged the 2nd stage and it went boom the debris would/could be in the path of IIS. Its a heck of a long shot but I guess its best to play it safe. The Orbcomm sat is under Dragon attached to 2nd stage, Dragon was released first and flew off on its own to meet the station. 2nd stage was to coast 10mins and do a restart. But pre-flight rules said no doing X if X happens. So SpaceX was forced to command the release of the Orbcomm sat.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,533

    Default

    Right. The danger (if you can call it that) was that a second failure could occur that might possibbly endanger the ISS. One hell of a long shot, I agree, but the last time the space agency started taking chances we had the Challenger disaster, so I can't really fault them for playing it safe.

    Adam

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    The Woods, CA, USA
    Posts
    534

    Default

    Doh, guess that sat could just not boost out of it's current orbit. "Orbcomm craft re-enters, company claims total loss"

    Updated story....http://spaceflightnow.com/falcon9/004/121011orbcomm/
    Last edited by Picasso; 10-11-2012 at 14:21.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •