Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Laser specifications GOOD OR BAD

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    380

    Smile Laser specifications GOOD OR BAD

    Hi Guys I need some advice on these specs Please much appreciated......

    Specifications:
    Laser: Diode Laser / Diode Pumped Solid State Laser
    Wavelength: green 532nm,red650nm,blue450nm
    Green: G1000mw
    Red: R2000mw
    Blue: B2000mw
    Total Output: 5000mw
    Cooling: air-cooled
    Scanning unit: ILDA 40Kpps closed loop scanner
    Scanning angle: 40
    Modes: Sound active / Auto mode / DMX512(12channels)
    ILDA Connector/LCD/Line control
    Main power: 100-250V, 50/60HZ, 150W
    Photonlexicon FTP Server.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    My immediate reaction would be steer clear of 650nm red.

    You can achieve the same brightness with lower power and better beam specs with 637nm or if you want a slightly deeper red, 642nm.

    This is 637nm in case you're wondering although the camera will have some influence on its appearance:





    You need to look towards the ends for the colour as the camera is over saturated near the aperture.
    Last edited by White-Light; 05-08-2013 at 03:22.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    380

    Default

    Thanks for the reply great red colour other than the red is it a good set up. How much for a system like this cost you think
    Photonlexicon FTP Server.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Mi
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    And the 650nm iirc is often a flying brick. You really need the specs of the lasers for anyone to offer a good opinion. beam size mrad etc
    leading in trailing technology

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    GuangZhou, China
    Posts
    273

    Default

    try 637nm Red 1W + 532nm Green 2W + 445nm Blue 2W.
    L.A.S.E.R.
    Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

    Laser system: Pure Diode 3W & 6W RGB Laser.



    www.facebook.com/saifer.sy
    www.laser-viva.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tony220171 View Post
    Thanks for the reply great red colour other than the red is it a good set up. How much for a system like this cost you think
    That's a 2.1 W Kvant Spectrum so yes its expensive - red is actually only 680mw @ specs (not measured).

    However, you can get 637nm or 642nm reds in other people's systems or separately to build your own.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    veenwouden
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    637nm is the way to go. Also the lower the divergence the higher the brightness and the better the graphics. A 3 watt low divergence looks the same as a 4 watt higher divergence. Also cheap powersupplies, scanners , safety features and other feautured determine the price of a projector. I have 650mw red with 1 watt green and 1.5 watt blue and i,m very happy with that.


    Interested in 6-12W RGB projectors with low divergence? Contact me by PM!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    380

    Default

    So how do you know which Lasers are the best regarding NW is there a chart to go with or just experience over the years????
    Photonlexicon FTP Server.


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    GuangZhou, China
    Posts
    273

    Default

    experience is a main point.
    There is a rate for each R.G.B power to balance.(different wavelength different rate).
    But for Analog laser, the brightness can be adjusted by Software, so it is not a problem to get the color you like...
    L.A.S.E.R.
    Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

    Laser system: Pure Diode 3W & 6W RGB Laser.



    www.facebook.com/saifer.sy
    www.laser-viva.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Once it was called "Bel Paese" = ITALY
    Posts
    858

    Default

    I agree with Edison and Song both.

    My 2.5W projector has inside:

    - 1W/650nm
    - 620mW/532
    - 800mW/445 (Edison)
    scanners: LW-50K (set at 25kpps).

    I adjusted only green color power by DS3-RGB level control (from *Stanwax*) cause it is little abundant and white point obtained is very good: bright white-snow.
    Even if the red is fat like a pig (its spot goes out from scanner mirrors), when I do "medium range projection" (I mean screen distance about 10 meters) I stll have acceptable results for graphic use.

    It is a good projector for beamshow. Tested last Christmas for indoor use (sport hall 50 x 30 meters), venue 450-500 people.

    What its weakness is? (apart the fat red..).
    Violet color: it is virtually impossible obtain a good point of it. Most part of time I have purple instead violet. I think this is because modules have not a great analog modulation range.

    Anyway... I'm 90% satisfied of my baby.

    Eheheh...Perfection is not for this Earth....
    Last edited by Steve Milani; 05-08-2013 at 21:56. Reason: type
    my webpage
    http://stevemilani.jimdo.com
    Skype ID: stevemilani957

    my RGB analogue projectors:
    3.9 W (640/532/445) 30kpps
    2.6 W (655/532/450) 30kpps
    2.5 W (638/532/450) 30kpps
    0.7 W (test unit)(635/532/473) 18kpps

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •