Automatic gain control? Just making sure I don't miss something important... Is this the thing that drivers do to make the scanned image smaller than expected if they think the galvos are in danger of being overdriven?
With the Widemoves I judged the overdrive partly by watching the circle in the ILDA pattern, and especially the jitter in the (usually blanked) bight that connects from the small square to begin the circle. There was also a distinctly dirty edge to the noise they make in a silent room when pushed to that point! That and the deterioration in repeated positional accuracy told me when to back off.
It will help me a lot to know what to look for when using the Cambridge system. While an AGC might protect better than I alone can, it might also mask an onset that I'd otherwise detect.
Jem, thanks, a clear image of things helps. I read about that power demand, could be enough to heat a small room. Something over 240W per axis I read somewhere. I'm ok with thermal design though, enough to solve the need, same for power supply. Won't be an overnight thing though. (And it was at least a year since I bought the Widemoves before I'd mounted them and run them having enough support to make it meaningful). Maybe I should keep the small platform I made just because it IS small. Did you go for very narrow beams for high visibility in air and fine graphics? That's pretty much what I want to do, but to explore image generation with light the way analog synthesisers can make sounds. 'Abstracts', in a way, but a more directed thing, ideally something that can become a live performance. I have a very synaesthesiastic take on how lasers might work with sound. This is why I want endurance. My Mackie HR-824 speakers seem to last forever and I'm hoping that CT6215's, if driven at modest levels, will run for many tens of thousands of hours without need of maintenance. I hope that isn't an impossible thing to ask of them, anyway...