Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Far field alignment

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    170

    Default Near/Far field Alignment

    This might help explain Near/ Far field Alginment for those interested. This was given to me a while back.

    As you probably know, the "far field" of a laser beam is
    unambiguously defined as the intensity and phase of the beam when it
    is propagated to an infinite distance from the laser.

    That infinite distance can be conveniently accessed simply by placing
    a positive focal length lens into the beam and viewing the resulting
    irradiance at the rear focal plane of the lens. Unfortunately, the
    resulting physical scale of the pattern is not convenient for viewing
    without special purpose hardware.

    I remedy that simply by projecting the far field on the wall of my
    laboratory with a second, short focal length lens. The far field
    pattern can them be easily viewed, and photographed with an ordinary camera.

    As shown in the attached figure, I used a 200 mm focal length lens to
    produce the far field pattern, and then projected that pattern on the
    wall with a 25 mm focal length lens. The projection distance in my
    setup was 15 feet (4.57 meters). Since that distance is so much
    larger than the 25 mm focal length, it is essentially at infinity as
    far as that lens is concerned. Thus, the 25 mm lens was axially
    positioned with respect to the 200 mm lens to put their focal points
    in coincidence. Physically, this is done by determining the distance
    between the facing surfaces of the two ThorLabs LMR lens mounts that
    corresponds to the focal points being in coincidence, and then
    spacing the lenses to achieve that distance between the LMR surfaces.

    The size of the far field pattern is then simply (200/25) times the
    divergence of the laser times 4.57 meters, or 36.6 mm per mRad. A
    target pattern was made up at that scale and was marked "Far Field of Beam".

    The "near field" of a laser beam is less well defined. It is often
    considered simply as the intensity and phase of the beam as it exits
    the laser aperture, but for more precise work, a better place to
    define it is at the waist of the beam, wherever that may lie. For
    precise determination of the quality of a laser beam, it is important
    to determine exactly where the waist of the beam is, and for real
    beams, the waist locations may differ in the "X" and "Y"
    directions. That is the case, for instance, with the red laser that
    I currently have for sale.

    Here, I don't worry about any of that. To visualize the near field,
    I simply remove the 25 mm lens from the setup shown in the
    figure. Then the 200 mm lens is essentially projecting the laser
    beam that exists at a plane near its front focal plane onto the
    wall. Thus, I am defining the "near field" to be the beam that
    exists at the plane that is coincident with the image of the wall as
    formed by the 200 mm lens. Working this out, the "near field" plane
    turns out to be 211.2 mm in front of the lens. The magnification of
    that plane on the wall is then about 22.7, so a target pattern was
    made up at a scale of 22.7 mm per mm of beam diameter and was marked
    "Near Field of Beam".

    Now, the original purpose of setting up this system was not primarily
    to characterize the parameters of a laser beam, but was instead to
    make it easy to align several laser beams (think red, green, and
    blue) to a single axis. To align the beams, it is necessary to bring
    them together in 4 degrees of freedom. In other words, one must
    align them both in the near field and in the far field. An easy
    method of switching back and forth between near and far fields was
    needed, and this is what I came up with. One need only to remove and
    replace the 25 mm lens to switch between viewing planes, and this is
    easily done once the system is initially aligned with both lenses in
    place, and with the post holder for the 25 mm lens fixed in position.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FarFieldVisualization.pdf 
Views:	28 
Size:	31.6 KB 
ID:	40762

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Norty - what's up with the two beams coming from the blue module? Are those brought together far-field with internal blue module alignment?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    100 feet with binoclears to see the "spot" :]

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Norty - what's up with the two beams coming from the blue module? Are those brought together far-field with internal blue module alignment?
    It's a knife edge arrangement, so at that distance from the source, you can still see the 2 diodes. The prism pair seems to accentuate the effect.
    By the time the beam gets to the scanners it appears as a single solid beam.

    The Kvant 637 red is exactly the same. Where it hits the dichro you can clearly see it is 6 beams like this ::: rather than a solid single beam.

    Quite simply, divergence has yet to have it's effect.

    This was also not at full power. When cranked up higher, the beams 'bloom' and spread and make this effect far less visible.
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •