You know Adam, I have to disagree with you here.
The reason that our sub-MPE "incident" became known was not out of a sense of transparency, it was because someone started a flame on the laserist list which spilled over into the ILDA list. It was not educational, it was not self-policing, it was not even remotely professional... It was hashed out on and off the list because that is where it started. I cannot imagine that ILDA would have put out a release on the ILDA list had that all happened privately. What purpose does that serve other than to embarrass and shame a member? It seems that this was already done the following day for the benefit of the attendees and I don't know what a wider dissemination would have accomplished.
A previous poster mentioned that Lobo should be "sanctioned." I don't know what that means and I do not believe that ILDA's board is empowered to do anything of that ilk in our bylaws. The closest thing we have is a "Letter of Reprimand" which can be issued by the board following an ethics complaint, investigation and recommendation of action to the board by the ethics committee. I doubt that such a tool would be appropriate in this case given Lobo's complete and wholly appropriate response to the incident. These kinds of punitive actions are really reserved for very serious occasions which, in my opinion, would generally include either a chain of events, or consistent or extreme indifference to safety standards. This was a one-time incident, and Lobo had a number of safety measures in place, including a guard, which in my view does not rise to the level of consistent or extreme indifference. Did the safety measures work as designed? No... but that is what led them to conduct a review and make adjustments as they should have done.
It is worth noting that the bylaws specifically forbid ILDA from giving publicity to a disciplinary action such as a suspension.
I should also mention that ILDA does not have any policies of which I am aware for making public notifications of such events. Please realize that such notifications would carry much more weight, and would need to be "official," than a discussion following a random posting on a e-mail list. issuing them should only be done under a standardized procedure with a rubric to determine when a release should be issued, to whom is should be sent and what it should say. This is an issue of both basic fairness and legal liability for the association.
I see where people are coming from here, and stopping the rumors certainly has value, but if we are going to err, I think it is best to err on the side of not exacerbating an issue involving an honest, and subsequently corrected, mistake in which no one was hurt.


Reply With Quote
buffo

Official "vag burner and big ass ION laser" fan club member
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
"And so shines a good deed in a weary world." - Willy Wonka
6 Steps To Prevent You From Getting SCAMMED On The Internet
