Page 10 of 14 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 135

Thread: Opnext HL6545MG Diodes

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    PN-
    ok you know what your doing.
    Ya never know who's on the other end of the line--for example, this guy:
    http://photonlexicon.com/forums/show...1058#post21058

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Ah... so since the wider, but better collimated beam will wind up being more intense at the longer distances, that will translate into it appearing to "reach out" further, so to speak?

    Or, am I barking up the wrong tree altogether? For example, when pointing either my red or green into the sky, the beam simply "ends" at some point. The beam remains bright up to a certain point, then just terminates without any appearance of a gradual fade... like a very long light saber. Without knowing why this happens, I assume this is an effect imposed by the human eye. Will this effect happen at approx. the same visual distance no matter what lens I use? If so, then perhaps the attempt for a "longer" looking beam is moot.

    Sorry for the OT... really should've started a seperate thread for all this.

    Edit: Steve-o... Jeez, that guy's gonna' tan his retina. One lesson I learned early on was to do a little research into something potentially dangerous before I start screwing around with it. When I was about 5, I stuck a screwdriver into a the socket of a little incandescent, AC powered nightlight, and got an explosion of sparks in my face. Quite lucky to have walked away with just a bunch of brown spots on my face from the sparks, which wiped off with a towel (mom cleaned them off after freaking out at my appearance...lol.)

    It's always amazing to me when people play around with things, with nary a clue about any potential dangers.
    Last edited by PNjunction; 03-26-2007 at 08:29.
    Alas, poor diode. I fried him well.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PNjunction View Post
    Ah... so since the wider, but better collimated beam will wind up being more intense at the longer distances, that will translate into it appearing to "reach out" further, so to speak?
    Yes, but it depends on who's watching. It will seem to reach better to those viewing it from the side, at greater distances from source.
    When pointing either my red or green into the sky, the beam simply "ends" at some point. The beam remains bright up to a certain point, then just terminates without any appearance of a gradual fade... like a very long (light saber. Without knowing why this happens, I assume this is an effect imposed by the human eye. Will this effect happen at approx. the same visual distance no matter what lens I use? If so, then perhaps the attempt for a "longer" looking beam is moot.
    That's perspective. It's partly eye, partly mind and interpretation. And actually has interesting implications regarding our dimensional perception, but that's way way off topic. The lens won't make a difference to you, at the source, even a fairly divergent laser will appear to reach the vanishing point, but if you're making a rod-like beacon for others to see, use all the collimation you can, ideally one big aspheric lens.

    ================================================== ========

    (Re dangers for people who don't know lasers, it might be good to have a large red sticky thread at the main page. Something that will draw people to look because they can't help themselves. The tricky bit is working out what to say so info is there without being hard to follow. I think the essential point is that green lasers are now common, and involve extremely dangerous levels of light that is hard or impossible to see.)

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Good idea Doctor.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,478

    Default

    Ty I'll try to write something later, and put it out for edit, review, whatever. Unlike coding, this is something I can do...

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    PN-
    Yeh I had the same dangerous curious streak when I was a kid -hell I still do I guess -

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Awesome answers, Doctor! Thanks! Definitely helps clear up a number of items.

    Good idea for the safety sticky as well.
    Alas, poor diode. I fried him well.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Iowa
    Posts
    249

    Default

    PN -

    WRONG -- Pi are round - Cornbread are square.

    Mike

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hemlock Mike View Post
    PN -

    WRONG -- Pi are round - Cornbread are square.
    Very true! And if you sliced the cornbread diagonally from two corners, you could figure the area of each half using Pythagorean Theorem.

    HOWEVER... after taking a bite of the cornbread, I believe you need differential calculus to determine the area of the bite, just like you would with pi.

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong. I'm hungry all of a sudden.
    Alas, poor diode. I fried him well.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    corn-pie-bread
    corn-bread-pie
    corn-bread-pudding
    bread-pudding
    pie-pudding
    corn-bread-pie-pudding

    If you got a CNC laser-cutter I bet you could perfectly slice a pie into 8 exact sized pieces or cornbread in under 200 ms

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •