Tom,
Those prices are impressive. I think you will sell a good number, especially with the additional quantity savings. What are the dimensions of the two mirrors that will come standard with these scanner sets?
Tom,
Those prices are impressive. I think you will sell a good number, especially with the additional quantity savings. What are the dimensions of the two mirrors that will come standard with these scanner sets?
Hello Mr. Meyer,
The X mirror is 6.85mm wide and the Y mirror is 5.25mm wide / 12mm long.
Regards,
Tom
Given the wisdom of Planters, I will refrain from further comments about 506 in this thread. However, I must reply to a few of Tom's assertions.
So you can go faster than 90K? With 4.5 ohm coil and 140 microhenry inductance? Really?
Hehe. Well at least one of us does
Actually the ideas of your EMS-4000 can be found in a patent that is 35 years old! Take a look at US Patent 4,302,720 (actually implemented in a way that is more clever than your 4000)...
Tom, it is we who have all of the fancy test equipment along with fancy magnetic design software. We would not go down a path that is unproductive!
The new X-3 magnetic circuit is not merely "refining the shape of the slots". In any event, the performance speaks for itself...
No, I don't recall any of the sort. In fact, I'm not even able to get two pairs of your EMS-8000 to do that! The only conclusion that I draw is that we are rating speeds in a fundamentally different way. Probably even rating beam diameters in a different way too!
If you'd start telling the truth about the performance and beam diameter than my reaction will be one of silence! It's only when specifications are exaggerated BY ANYBODY that I get upset. And it's not just you Tom!!
I checked out recent QS5 Nutfield scanners, and the performance I see is not reflected in their online specs. At the Photonics West conference I called this to the attention of their new company president.
And in 1998, when Cambridge announce 60K performance from their 6210 scanners I publicly called them out then too! See this thread as a reminder:
http://www.laserfx.com/Backstage.Las...Scanning2.html
We don't want to lie to the people. We want to actually tell the truth about what beam diameter people can expect to project, over what kind of angle, and at what kind of speed. We want our specs to actually be repeatable and meaningful in the marketplace. But if we are the only ones telling the truth, then it might seem underwhelming when other people are lying about 60K and 5mm and wide angles... That's a problem!
Bill
Last edited by Pangolin; 06-14-2014 at 05:19.
Bill,
Welcome back. I think you're back, right?
In any case, I too am tired of communicating with Nutfield, asking a question and then either not hearing anything or being told, by them, that their published specs should be revised.
I can't wait to get a hold of a Saturn SYSTEM for true 5mm beams. Keep in touch.
I'm not quite back yet. Visiting a few clients in Germany before I return.
For sure you'll be hearing from me ;-)
Bill
Fogscreen eMotion 2,2m walkthrough screen
Tarm 2W RGB witn CT 6800
2 x 1W G with DT40W
2 x Edison case with Ems-7000(upgraded), Edison 1,3w red and blue.
4 x 1500mw RGB
LSX pro with Etherdream
Fiesta.net + slave
Moncha.net
you don't need a case, fire it up already!!!
"its called character briggs..."
My workshop/warehouse is not suitable for electronics right now. Make my best to get in and out without a breaking my leg.
Cant wait to test it out, have 1w red waiting to be scanned.
Fogscreen eMotion 2,2m walkthrough screen
Tarm 2W RGB witn CT 6800
2 x 1W G with DT40W
2 x Edison case with Ems-7000(upgraded), Edison 1,3w red and blue.
4 x 1500mw RGB
LSX pro with Etherdream
Fiesta.net + slave
Moncha.net
Oh I received them too some weeks ago (and somewhat forgot to write it here), but I had to install the EMS-8000 from the same package first so no time yet to test the 5100...