Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 151

Thread: 1.4W 462nm Laser Diode

  1. #101
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Germany (Kassel)
    Posts
    264

    Default

    I do not have a G-2 lens, so I can only make a beam profile measurement for the Geltech lens. Attached is a test report with the Geltech lens and the 462nm diode.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails NDB7675 with Geltech Aspheric Lens.pdf  


  2. #102
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Hmm .. Nice profiling equipment you have there Lasertack. Looks expensive. Unfortunately I don't know how to translate that into a comparative analysis. Thanks though, I appreciate the image and the info!

  3. #103
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Germany (Kassel)
    Posts
    264

    Default

    There are not many things to translate. It looks much more complicated as it really is. To get a quick impression just look at the beam size "Site 5 -> Spatial ->D4σM and D4σm" and at the profile (2D and 3D) itself. Homogeneous, Gaussian like profile indicates good lens quality with low or almost no scattering caused by bad coating or any other defect of the lens. Tomorrow IŽll take some pics of an "O-Like" lens which makes the beam quality (not divergence or size) much worse.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Ok, thanks. I'm trying to get an idea of the beam size at the aperture and divergence after the correction optics using this lens vs the other one. You know, the usual stuff that we need to know.
    Last edited by steve-o; 05-26-2014 at 17:31.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Germany (Kassel)
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by steve-o View Post
    Ok, thanks. I'm trying to get an idea of the beam size at the aperture and divergence after the correction optics using this lens vs the other one. You know, the usual stuff that we need to know.
    The beam size at the aperture AFTER correction depends on the magnification factor you set the optics to. For a test I set it up to for ~3x magnification. The beam size at the aperture is shown in the 2D image.The divergence is about 1.1mrad @ full angle.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1_0002.jpeg 
Views:	42 
Size:	122.9 KB 
ID:	43360 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	13D_0001.jpeg 
Views:	31 
Size:	92.6 KB 
ID:	43361
    Last edited by lasertack; 05-27-2014 at 03:36.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lasertack View Post
    The beam size at the aperture AFTER correction depends on the magnification factor you set the optics to. For a test I set it up to for ~3x magnification. The beam size at the aperture is shown in the 2D image.The divergence is about 1.1mrad @ full angle.
    Thanks Lasertack. Those numbers look very good.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Germany (Kassel)
    Posts
    264

    Default

    Yep, they do

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire UK
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    I've been following this thread with great interest and tonight I decided to bite the bullet and ordered two diodes from DTR for the rebuild of my 2 Stanwax projectors.

    I will post photos when I get them fitted which won't be for a few weeks yet.
    2 x Stanwax Laser 3W RGB's
    2 x OPT 10W RGB
    Pangolin FB3QS + Live Pro
    1.3W Laser Harp

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,382

    Default

    ^ Nice, Carl. Looking forward to the pics

    On a different note, I wonder what's up with this? No availability. I know they would be too expensive for an engineering sample for a "hobbyist" .. Nichia just seems to dangle this spec sheet out there for what purpose ?? To get a nibble from a large corporation maybe .. 1.2 watts of ~473nm .. dammmn ....

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	470.png 
Views:	74 
Size:	97.8 KB 
ID:	43410

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Here's a pic of my recently completed modules (by logsquared, not me!) which use a 462/445 combination.

    Chris reports they are corrected nicely along with the 445 and he could see a clear difference in the colours.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC02771.JPG 
Views:	166 
Size:	4.29 MB 
ID:	43424
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •