Points were re-stated above and acknowledged by others in this thread.
Correct, but only to illustrate a point. I know the answer to the three points. My use of the word "if" was to highlight the point. I guess English is not your native language.
For example, if I wrote: "if Bill Benner has 20 patents, he must be a pretty technically astute guy" it would not necessarily be an assumption or question, but more of an illustration. In fact Bill Benner does have 20 patents! It could be re-stated that "if *anybody* has 20 patents, they must be a pretty technically astute guy (or gal)".
Let me give you another example: If any of Pangolin's best dealers do not use a particular Pangolin product, that would be illustrative that the particular product in question is not that relevant, useful, affordable, etc. And we certainly have some obscure products like that (Dazzler for example, Lasershow Puppeteer as another example and I am sure there are others). We too have some products that have been on the list for a long time, but are not particularly popular.
If (there's that word again) anyone was to point out the fact that Dazzler or Lasershow Puppeteer or some of our other unpopular products are not selling well, not widely used, etc. these would be statements of fact -- not flames. Moreover, if (there's that word again) anyone was to make such statements on the forum, as the President of Pangolin I would publicly agree to such statements of fact, not be offended by them. For sure we've sold only a few Dazzlers in history, and only a few Lasershow Puppeteers as well. These are facts, not flames!
Niether, but your behavior and past posts show that you're going to snipe at me personally no matter what. Fortunately at least others in this thread have shown that my posts have value and relevance.
You have LaNeK779 to thank for that ...
Bill