Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Anyone Built...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    346

    Default

    My RGB in process, but with spatial filter and TEC cooling-heating

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    East Sussex, England
    Posts
    5,248

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	2.33 MB 
ID:	45591Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	1.75 MB 
ID:	45589Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	45590Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	1.42 MB 
ID:	45592Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	2.03 MB 
ID:	45593


    Lovely little shipping crate too
    Frikkin Lasers
    http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk

    You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?

    I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Nice build!
    On red section, Do you obtain better beam profile with Plano-concave curved side towards diode? We usually orient PC flat side towards diode...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jors View Post
    Nice build!
    On red section, Do you obtain better beam profile with Plano-concave curved side towards diode? We usually orient PC flat side towards diode...
    Planters had made a post awhile back about getting better results with some of the lenses reversed. I tried it with Dave's cylinders and some from Edmonds I had around. I could not get a improvement then. These lenses are from Edison. I saw a huge (20%) reduction in spot size with the PC reversed! I believe it may be due to the thickness of the edison PC lens. I think the thickness allowed the rapidly expanding beam to converge a lot inside the glass before hitting the curved side.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Want to try these setups soon. The idea is going with only ONE cylinder set correction for all diodes.
    I want to try this also. I tried it with a single 300mm FL cylinder. It worked! But with a 4, 6, 8 power telescope I fear focusing all the spots may be harder. However, the telescope on the green and blue is much more tolerant of distance from the diodes so it may be possible.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by logsquared View Post
    Planters had made a post awhile back about getting better results with some of the lenses reversed. I tried it with Dave's cylinders and some from Edmonds I had around. I could not get a improvement then. These lenses are from Edison. I saw a huge (20%) reduction in spot size with the PC reversed! I believe it may be due to the thickness of the edison PC lens. I think the thickness allowed the rapidly expanding beam to converge a lot inside the glass before hitting the curved side.
    I agree, I also tried with PCs from Dave & Edmund and didn't noticed better results on this setup

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by logsquared View Post
    I want to try this also. I tried it with a single 300mm FL cylinder. It worked! But with a 4, 6, 8 power telescope I fear focusing all the spots may be harder. However, the telescope on the green and blue is much more tolerant of distance from the diodes so it may be possible.

    Yes, I looked at your thread, impressive diode centering mounts!!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Indiana
    Posts
    921

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jors View Post
    Yes, I looked at your thread, impressive diode centering mounts!!
    Thanks!

    I made a crappy paint drawing of what I think happens with thicker lenses. The further you get from center of the incoming beam the more it refracts on the plano surface. I believe this causes the aberrations. Maybe someone smarter/ more versed in optics can give more insight.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PCLENS.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	16.6 KB 
ID:	45610

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    8,648

    Default

    i would agree with you on this one, again not clued up on it though

    Quote Originally Posted by logsquared View Post
    Thanks!

    I made a crappy paint drawing of what I think happens with thicker lenses. The further you get from center of the incoming beam the more it refracts on the plano surface. I believe this causes the aberrations. Maybe someone smarter/ more versed in optics can give more insight.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PCLENS.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	16.6 KB 
ID:	45610
    Eat Sleep Lase Repeat

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by logsquared View Post
    Thanks!

    I made a crappy paint drawing of what I think happens with thicker lenses. The further you get from center of the incoming beam the more it refracts on the plano surface. I believe this causes the aberrations. Maybe someone smarter/ more versed in optics can give more insight.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PCLENS.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	16.6 KB 
ID:	45610
    nice explanation, thanks!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •