Thanks. Thats interesting. I thought the brighter ones had one big one in them.
Thanks. Thats interesting. I thought the brighter ones had one big one in them.
I think the major problem with multiple projectors will be alignment. You not only have to align in X and Y to a fraction of a pixel, but you have to avoid rotation to the same precision AND you have to have the magnification so similar that if the pixels in the very centers of the projections are overlapping,then the pixels at the edge of the field overlap to a fraction of their width. Otherwise, the image might get brighter but the resolution will suffer.
An alternative is to tile the screen with the projections. This eases the alignment to the interface which is often a blend over several pixels in width. Here the brightness of the individual tiles needs to be adjusted so that they are not seen as separate. You can avoid two axis keystone-ing by building separate stacks for each vertical row.
Remember Remember The 8th of November, When No One Stood, but Kneel, In Surrender
In a popular government when the laws have ceased to be executed, as this can come only from the corruption of the republic, the state is already lost. Montesquieu
Only if you reduce it using optics.
Frikkin Lasers
http://www.frikkinlasers.co.uk
You are using Bonetti's defense against me, ah?
I thought it fitting, considering the rocky terrain.
Absolutely. However, norty is correct. Just place your projector twice as close to the screen or use a long distance lens and the brightness rises as the area covered decreases. No light is lost.Does this mean decreasing projection size increases brightness?