Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: 7 more days until Pluto

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    I wish they could slow down. What a place to spend some time.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    1 hr from everything in SoCal
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Very true. As it stands, I think they only have a couple of KBOs targeted. Seems like such a waste. If they can ever perfect a reliable ion drive or solar sail, perhaps in the future...
    If you're the smartest person in the room, then you're in the wrong room.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    mid michigan
    Posts
    814

    Default

    A solar sail that can reset it's self would be nice lol
    Remember Remember The 8th of November, When No One Stood, but Kneel, In Surrender
    In a popular government when the laws have ceased to be executed, as this can come only from the corruption of the republic, the state is already lost. Montesquieu

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    They could use the solar sail to get a fully fueled, ion drive ( yes, I know it would need to be nuclaler -Bush) to the target. Then, it would have the capacity to slow down. We can just about do this now if we wanted to.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,459

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Draco View Post
    I remember the morons protesting the launch because of the plutonium reactor these have
    Just a minor nit-pick here. The RTG is not a reactor. There is no chain reaction taking place inside. It generates heat purely due to the radioactive decay of the plutonium. That heat is converted into electricity using an array of thermocouples.

    In the end, the difference is a small one. Were the rocket to explode on liftoff, there is still a slight chance that the RTG could be broken open, which might scatter the plutonium around the area. And even though the fuel is not enriched enough to undergo a chain reaction, it is still highly radioactive. (Spreading radioactive elements around haphazardly is generally accepted to be a bad thing.)

    However, if it was actually a fission reactor, the fuel would need to be enriched, making it even more dangerous if the rocket blew up, the container ruptured, and the fuel got scattered around.

    Adam

    PS: In before others ask: No, even if it were a reactor, there is no chance that the rocket exploding could somehow cause the reactor to explode like a bomb. Reactors are very different from bombs, despite what Hollywood would have you believe.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    (Spreading radioactive elements around haphazardly is generally accepted to be a bad thing.)
    Don't tell my wife. We have her convinced that what we do is completely safe.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    1 hr from everything in SoCal
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    13 more hours to go!

    Closer image:
    http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/Multimedia/S...2&image_id=222
    If you're the smartest person in the room, then you're in the wrong room.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    There should be some live event on TV tomorrow but I just don't see anything. Such a shame. They could explain and even show a few live images coming in and maybe an animation of plutos rotation.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    1 hr from everything in SoCal
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dream beamz View Post
    and even show a few live images coming in and maybe an animation of plutos rotation.
    It would be cool but there is no way they could pull this off. They probe is moving too fast to capture full rotation. The other downer is that they couldn't possible show a live feed. From that distance, the New Horizons downlink is only 2kbits per second. As it stands, it will take up to 16 months to send back all the data and images from the fly-by. It's a shame that Pluto couldn't capture the probe so we could keep studying it.
    If you're the smartest person in the room, then you're in the wrong room.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Indiana, US
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by absolom7691 View Post
    It would be cool but there is no way they could pull this off. They probe is moving too fast to capture full rotation. The other downer is that they couldn't possible show a live feed. From that distance, the New Horizons downlink is only 2kbits per second. As it stands, it will take up to 16 months to send back all the data and images from the fly-by. It's a shame that Pluto couldn't capture the probe so we could keep studying it.
    Agreed How great would it be to have a picture of our sun, from pluto? Just a small little dot in the sky...Man, I hope I get to see manned exploration of at LEAST mars in my life time Sure wish I lived several hundred years in the future!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •