Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Surgical Laser Technologies YAG laser

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, England
    Posts
    478

    Default Surgical Laser Technologies YAG laser

    A local surplus company has a 'YAG' laser listed, they state it's rated at 100W but not much else. The unit is maked Surgical Laser Technologies and the unit is the resonator and optics mounted on a plate and what looks to be a sheet metal cover. Does anyone know what these units really are? They have a PSU as well which appears to be an arc lamp supply, so I'm guessing the laser is CW.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,850

    Default

    If it's the model I'm thinking of, they're older-vintage Mid-Late 90's standard medical 1064nm YAGs.
    There's two models from memory, one they call the "100", which actually gives EITHER 40W or 60W (depends if you run it off 110V or 220V respectively).
    Or the other model is the "220" which actually outputs 100W @ 1064nm.
    Both units used either 400µm or 600µm fibre, some uncommon fibres were 800µm.
    They are CW, but highly doubt it is suitable for 100% duty cycle as is.

    Edit: They also make some Holmium models, so watch out you 100% don't get a 2.1µm model

    Show use? Nope.
    Other use? Probably good for a laser engraver project if you've a lot of time.

    Dan
    - There is no such word as "can't" -
    - 60% of the time it works every time -

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, England
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Cheers Dan. It's a good price, wondering if it can be doubled without major effort.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, England
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Well it's mine now Because I went and collected it and paid cash, he knocked £50 off for the head and power supply, and he also threw in the original bottom half of the cart which has all the cooling system components in it.
    Now need to look at the head in a bit more detail to see what's what, but it looks to be in extremely good condition.
    It's a 100W unit and is arc lamp pumped, not sure of the lamp size yet, but it's a 3.8kW lamp driver that's with it.
    Looking for a nice KTP crystal now

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NobleGas View Post
    Looking for a nice KTP crystal now
    Good work Sir!

    @KTP... I'm fairly sure I've still got some new "LSCP KTP's" with or without mounts + oven/TEC's I could sell if of interest to you?
    I've also got a suitable special KTP (able to withstand Q-switch level powers) coated for 1319nm + suppressing 1064nm if you fancied making a high power 660nm beast
    (I've only ever heard of one similar system; I planned to "convert" an old LSCP green-> red but never found the time to.)
    As you'd be finding optics for 1064/532 anyway, it wouldn't hurt too much to get 1319/660 + suppress 1064nm instead Anyway, food for thought!

    Dan
    - There is no such word as "can't" -
    - 60% of the time it works every time -

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    For doubling, you will need to reach very high fluence levels. An external cavity that contained the KTP would help and allowed a very small spot size might help


    Here is a question I have been thinking about. Could you place a Q switch into the CW system? Place an attenuator in the beam path, start the Q switch, then open the attenuator slowly to avoid a giant pulse.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    ... hmmm ... I have two old (1996) NdYAG marking lasers with 120W and 150W averaged - one still complete, the other partially disassembled, but all loose parts there or reused in other optical setups.

    Was thinking about testing with 808nm-pumping ...

    Viktor

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    3,513

    Default

    Was thinking about testing with 808nm-pumping ...
    I think this would work. One challenge will be the doping level. An arc lamp has only a small percentage of its output at the absorption peak, so of course, in theory, you could get much higher efficiency, but penetration depth and therefore even pumping might suffer. One trick might be to build a hybrid system. What I mean is that you keep the standard arc lamp based pumping chamber, but remove the arc lamp and plug the chamber where the lamp was mounted. Mill a cover for the pump chamber with a window, even acrylic would work. Then flood the chamber with an externally mounted diode stack.

    And, here's the trick; detune the stack with temperature to optimize the absorption depth. You do not necessarily want maximum absorption. Let the photons bounce around a bit within the chamber, before absorption, to even out the pumping. The lower heat load will probably also improve the beam characteristics.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    ... I have a 25W@808nm-diode, what's essentially one of the 19x diode-bars into a housing, where 19 fibers are aligned before every emitter and bundled to a 0.6mm wide output window.

    Was thinking to beam the output from the side into the front face, so it can reflect inside the rod and when escaping, then 'bouncing' around in the gold coated pumping chamber to hit the rod from the sides too.

    Was hoping to get some of the 'naked' 19x diode-bars for side-pumping (through windows into the pumping chamber) too, but this seems to take a while :-/

    Viktor

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, England
    Posts
    478

    Default

    Dan, that sounds interesting; let me know what you manage to dig up please.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •