Pesident Clinton

[planters]

Planters, man, seriously. Not every HRC supporter or liberal is out rioting.

logsquared,

Dude, of course they are not. Where did I say that? What I said, very clearly is that James should repudiate their actions and so should you. So far, I haven't heard that. It shouldn't be that hard, their actions are reprehensible.

You say you are happy but keep saying negative things.

I am happy with the election and the long term consequences. I am not happy with the response of the loosers. Insults and riots are not the response that will help their side in the long run. It only demonstrates why their side was defeated. They didn't get it and apparently they still don't.

Negative news feeds? Do you suggest I read news feeds that put a positive spin on riots and murder? I don't look for spin either way, the facts, just the facts, mam. Do you dispute them?

[logsquared]

Dude, of course they are not. Where did I say that? What I said, very clearly is that James should repudiate their actions and so should you. So far, I haven't heard that. It shouldn't be that hard, their actions are reprehensible.

You said HRC voters are idiots. I think this supports the "us against them" rhetoric you seem to be expressing. All through out this thread you seem to link SJW, BLM, etc with all liberals. This just isn't true.

Previously, I have stated I don't support violent or illegal protesting. Protesting fine. I'm even ok with mild civil disobedience. Trying to say someone supports violence and rioting because they haven't reputed it on here is ridiculous. Is it my duty duty to repute every dumb thing someone does? Do I have to post it here on the laser board? If so, its gonna take a lot of typing.

Negative news feeds? Do you suggest I read news feeds that put a positive spin on riots and murder? I don't look for spin either way, the facts, just the facts, mam. Do you dispute them?

I am suggesting its not as broadly supported as you seem to think. Also, contrary to what you have posted earlier, I think its highly likely had the "other side" lost we would be seeing the same type of things just with other sections of society. I don't see any way to dispute that a Trump loss could have had less social disruption and disturbance.

[discothefunkyhippo]

Eric, what is it that ails you my friend?

-Sal

[planters]

[QUOTEThese idiots, the rioters, are not the victims.][/QUOTE]

This is what I said and that is what I meant. Don't extrapolate what I said to all HRC supporters and then criticize me for it. This is at best sloppy and at worst dishonest.

Previously, I have stated I don't support violent or illegal protesting.

Thanks, that's good to hear. If I missed that then I apologize.

I am suggesting its not as broadly supported as you seem to think.

Maybe not, but it needs to be stopped and the supporters of HRC that oppose it, need to be heard. James?

I think its highly likely had the "other side" lost we would be seeing the same type of things just with other sections of society.

I disagree strongly. And seeing as this is just a supposition on your part and the only ones actually rioting are on one side of this issue then the evidence is against you.

Eric, what is it that ails you my friend?

Disco, what do you mean? My side won. Your side lost and comes across as bitter and fearful of the changes that are to come. Are you OK?

[james]

Maybe not, but it needs to be stopped and the supporters of HRC that oppose it, need to be heard. James?

What? Who said I support HRC? And why should I speak for a whole bunch of people I don't even know? I certainly do not support Trump. HRC just happened to be the only real alternative.

A friend of mine had to expalin to me what a "snowflake" is. That's not cool. It doesn't fit me at all. You don't know anything about me and you certainly have no real reason to call anyone names in this forum. I think that is more of a reflection on you than anything else. It's one of those loaded code words. That's exactly the kind of crap that makes people not want to have anything to do with you.

[dkumpula]

Planters, man, seriously. Not every HRC supporter or liberal is out rioting. You say you are happy but keep saying negative things. Stop reading all the negative news feeds. Don't let fear control your thinking.

I agree. Every time trump, the far right nationalists / white supremacists do/say something awful, Eric and the other trump supporters go silent or respond to challenges with deflections of how government is evil or Hillary did X instead of answering or admonishing such actions / language. But yet when any tiny thing is done by Dems they are all over it and condem the whole group. It's obvious hypocrisy using "the best defense is a good offense" that trump (and Eric) have employed here for the past year or more. Truth, facts, and fair debates go missing while hatred and fear rule the day. Welcome to the Alt-right USA.

[james]

That's probably one of the most sentient things I've read in this thread.

[planters]

Most of us are aghast and totally freaked out and scared shitless by the rhetoric that got Trump elected.

Please try to understand that some of us are truly afraid of what this administration might do to OUR LIVES, FOR REAL.

No other administration in modern times has been so frightening.

A friend of mine had to expalin to me what a "snowflake" is. That's not cool. It doesn't fit me at all. You don't know anything about me and you certainly have no real reason to call anyone names in this forum

No, I don't know you, this descriptive is based on the words you wrote.

But yet when any tiny thing is done by Dems they are all over it and condem the whole group.

What tiny thing are you referring to? Hmm?

It's obvious hypocrisy using "the best defense is a good offense" that trump (and Eric) have employed here for the past year or more. Truth, facts, and fair debates go missing while hatred and fear rule the day. Welcome to the Alt-right USA.

You're upset, You lost and you are doubling down by attacking with mud rather than a good argument. OK, but don't ask us to reach out and understand your concerns.

The changes that Trump's victory portend are long term. Undermining the elites of the Uniparty, clamping down on voter fraud, enforcing border laws, preventing the IRS from targeting political enemies, Sessions as Attorney General??, and the financial rebirth of even a little of the rust belt will mean we should get used to President Trump for a long time.

Some on this forum follow European politics as well (some in fact actually live in Europe). The political evolution represented by Trump is being mirrored across Europe as well. Hundreds of millions of people are following the self destructive policies of their governments and they don't approve of how the current "leaders" are managing it. It isn't just me and Jon and a handful of others that have posted on this thread that disagree with you. If you are looking for a safe space on this thread to read the echo's of your own thoughts...sorry. Welcome to the USA!

[dchammonds]

Well, I just knew if I Googled Trump and 666 I would find some serious entertainment. See for yourself.

http://www.thehypertexts.com/Donald%...rist%20666.htm

The funny thing is that the author makes some good points amidst the madness... LOL!

[logsquared]

This is what I said and that is what I meant. Don't extrapolate what I said to all HRC supporters and then criticize me for it. This is at best sloppy and at worst dishonest.

There are way over 4.3 million idiots that voted for HRC and lost.

I think its highly likely had the "other side" lost we would be seeing the same type of things just with other sections of society.

I disagree strongly. And seeing as this is just a supposition on your part and the only ones actually rioting are on one side of this issue then the evidence is against you.

I guess you win here. As of course I can't prove it. Very cowardly way out though.