there are some people who have moved *from* QS to LSX.
QS is quite easy to get started making light with and is quite a good value, but it's (IMHO) not really designed for more sophisticated effects like beyond and lsx are.

Originally Posted by
Bradfo69
I didn't realize Quickshow worked well with TouchOSC. That's interesting and I'll have to explore it. Thanks!
`
I wanted to add - after reading and re-reading - that to be fair, each particular piece of software has it's areas where it shines. Why I like Quickshow and encourage it is simply because it's the "Swiss Army Knife" of software. Collectively it does the most different things... well. And easily. Is it the absolute best in each area? No. It has it's limitations. If it didn't, Pangolin wouldn't have created Beyond. LSX for example is much more powerful in some specialized areas such as abstracts. And as mentioned, for doing multi projector shows, in the long run it's going to be cheaper because the DAC's are cheaper. LSX + 5 DAC's (Etherdreams) to run 5 projectors would set you back as little as $1140. Whereas 5 FB3's retail is close to $3,000. So yes there are pros and cons. I only push it because my feeling is whatever aspect of laser display you are into and whatever you may later decide you want to move toward, Quickshow will at least give you capable tools to get started, whereas others may lack an area or two.
suppose you're thinkin' about a plate o' shrimp. Suddenly someone'll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o' shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin' for one, either. It's all part of a cosmic unconciousness.