Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Smallest feasible heat sink for 400mw 638 red diode?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    907

    Default Smallest feasible heat sink for 400mw 638 red diode?

    I'm currently using a z-bolt 12mm mount/heat sink for my projector rebuild project, but I want (err, need) to add a double bounce mirror for the red diode, and in order to fit it on the beam table, I'm looking for suggestions for the smallest realistic/feasible heat sink+mount I can use for a 400mw 638 diode in a 12mm barrel case.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    526

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DTR View Post
    That's exactly what I already have! But it's too big! I was looking for something smaller, but enough to do the job.

    thanks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    171

    Default

    Some people use these in their builds also. http://www.amazon.com/uxcell-Linear-.../dp/B00G9HSJ4C
    However, there is little flexibility in alignment.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KANG View Post
    Some people use these in their builds also. http://www.amazon.com/uxcell-Linear-.../dp/B00G9HSJ4C
    However, there is little flexibility in alignment.
    Thanks.

    Will that supply adequate cooling?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,319

    Default

    No it will still need a baseplate you'd bolt it on so the clamp can lose it's heat.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masterpj View Post
    No it will still need a baseplate you'd bolt it on so the clamp can lose it's heat.
    Yes, I assumed that part! Thanks.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,319

    Default

    The only way you can make it smaller is by driving the diode less hard.. run it a little bit under the specifications of the datasheet... then get a heatsink with a LOT of surface area (so the ones with very fine fins with the little waves/bumps on those fins) will make the difference as it's either that or mass.. or both. Use heatsink compound as well for a good contact with your heatsink.. use a thermistor or thermocouple and measure as close to the center of the heatsink as possible to see if the temperature remains stable..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Have you tried a standard rectangular laser mounts?
    http://stores.ebay.com/Techhood/Lase...m322#&panel1-3
    They have more volume and surface area to absorb the heat than repurposed shaft holders. Copper absorbs heat faster but if the volume is less and no active cooling to cool the copper itself then you might not notice much difference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •