Well it makes sense when the laser is powerful enough to burn the retina when focussed by the eye's lens but not powerful enough to burn the cornea unfocussed.
Laser rangefiners are a very important instrument in the modern battlefield and those lasers are supposed to be safe. However then the powers are too low for realy accurate readings (and wavelengths too long?) so in order to hit anything on target you really need unsafe lasers. I heard that the convention is (don't know where it is written) that you may ONLY use unsafe laser to get the range to the target when you have the intention of killing it. You are NOT allowed to use the range finder to potentially blind your target without the intention of killing it!
Always thought that was kind of funny....
Hmmmm, blind or dead? Rough choices huh?
I have a question:
I know that the easiest way to test the IR led of a remote control is to watch it using a videocamera.
Does anybody ever tried to use a videocamera to compare a laser with or without an IR filter mounted?
If the differencies are vell detectable, it might be very handy for peoples (like me) without specific instruments, to avoid unnecessary risks.
Luciano
I have used the "night shot" feature on my video camera to see the IR from my TTL green with no IR filter. I have some pictures here somewhere on the board... I'll see if I can find them.
Pitopito;
You might enjoy reading this thread from last year. Pay particular attention to Weak Station's solution to protecting his eyes from IR while still being able to see. It sounds goofy, but I'm sure it worked quite well.
Adam
You should especially make filters for the <5 mW pointers. By law, almost everywhere, a laser pointer is defined to output less than five milliwatts of visible light, NO exceptions. That means you must filter IR and regulate the visible output power. This is more demanding than the needs for OEM and lab lasers, where specs depend on what is wanted, not on what is law.