I do, however I think the regulation regarding this lacks fine detail, which is made up for the in compliance guide. Last thing I'd ever want to run into is some bonehead CDRH rep saying, "Well didn't you consult the Compliance Guide?" Anyway, as mliptack suggested, the only reason I bring it up is to spur this conversation. It would be great to iron out the fine details such as this so we can all build quality, certifiable projectors.Well, I'm sure you realize that the compliance guide is not the same thing as the actual regulation. The passage that I quoted above was direct from 21 CFR 1040.10. Also, the compliance guide was last updated back in 1989, whereas the actual regulation was just updated in April of last year. (Many of the changes were part of the whole "least burdensome approach" thing they've been implementing lately.)
Well, it will be interesting to hear the results which would benefit many of us here.You know, this might be an amusing topic to bring up with a CDRH rep.
Regarding the STPx-8, or whatever, I'd be willing to bet, that the response time of the GM-20 is much better than the STP-8. Wish I had known you needed one, I just sold off my last one! Here's one I found on ebay, reasonably priced with armature. They really are an ideal solution. http://cgi.ebay.com/Scanner-Galvo-Ga...sid=p1638.m118 I just love the guys comment, buy this gm20 and go on tour and make millions of dollars!! Its from Laserman532, hey, isn't that a member here?