Q:About how long ago was the initial purchase? Do you remember? Also, when did you first send it back? Dates can be important, because as you'll see below, you are but one victim among many. Any information you have will be another piece to the puzzle.
A: I bought in late 2006 and sent the unit back maybe 2 weeks later.
Q:
As for the failure mode - the most likely cause is back-reflection, not a driver failure. Backreflection causes instantaneous (and permanent) damage to the diode face. Most Maxyz modules failed because of this, mainly because they were operated very close to their absolute power limit. That makes them more suceptible to damage due to back-reflection. For a while, you could get them repaired at cost, even if it was back-reflection that killed it. But lately that option has vanished.
A: I do not belive my failure mode could have anything to do with back- reflection (AKA Backscatter). The unit was operated on my test bench and the beam was terminated on a black aluminum surface. After the failure the unit still outputs 1mw with the beam looking exactly like it did at full power (Crosshair pattern common to this unit). It really does seem like TTL control failure or PSU failure
Q: Or rather "Comment:"
Since then it's gotten much worse. There are a number of members here that did not receive their lasers. Some people were owed warranty repairs, while others had paid in advance for new lasers and never received them. Still others sent equipment to Chuck to be modified and never heard from him again. Some of these deals that went bad ended up costing the members thousands of dollars.
A: OK I was a bit confused by your first email thinking that MAXyz was in good standing on this site. I am following the correct thread and I also last heard from chuck via ebay in May 08 via ebay. He seemed very willing to help and asked me what my serial number was. It was after responding to him with the details that I never heard back. So sad because I need that darn 660 to complete my RGB projector
Skacutter..... Admin www.kasperwing.com
There's some good information in Sam's Laser FAQ about it. Look in the diode laser section. There are also more than a few posts that address it here.
Possibly. Or maybe you've never reflected the beam back into the diode. (which might be considered either lucky or careful, depending on your point of view.)I have heard horror stories about reds dying all the time. Mine is shining away happily. Am I just lucky?
OK - back in 2006 there were some TTL Maxyz modules floating around, and yeah, those may not have been protected against having greater than 5 volts on the modulation lead. That problem was fixed with the later analog driver. (I've connected up to 9 volts on the modulation lead on mine with no adverse effects.)
Also, it seems that the *latest* versions (shipped in early 2008) have reverted to a more basic driver that may also lack the over-voltage protection on the modulation line even though the driver is still analog-capable. I haven't tested any of these newer units myself, but posts from others (including a picture of the innards of a dead unit showing the driver components) suggest that there's no protection on the modulation input anymore.
Usually over-current will cause the same symptoms as back-reflection, which are identical to the ones you describe above, so that really doesn't tell us anything. However, given your description of your test setup, it does seem to rule out back-reflection.I do not belive my failure mode could have anything to do with back- reflection (AKA Backscatter). The unit was operated on my test bench and the beam was terminated on a black aluminum surface. After the failure the unit still outputs 1mw with the beam looking exactly like it did at full power (Crosshair pattern common to this unit). It really does seem like TTL control failure or PSU failure
Note: Backscatter is not really the same thing as back-reflection. Back-reflection kills the diode by dramatically increasing the optical power at the face of the diode. Since the diode is running so close to maximum, by sending the beam back along the same path, the optical power density at the face exceeds the damage threshold and the face is ruined nearly instantaneously. The important difference is that a significant percentage of the output beam is reflected *directly* back to the diode, as opposed to simply being scattered off a rough surface back in the general direction of the diode.
His status has been changing lately. As of this time last year, his standing was among the best. So good, in fact, that Bridge (LaserWave representative) agreed to send him a 100 mw DPSS blue laser so he could do a long-term test-to-failure on it. (Note that we haven't had an update on that test in many months!) So at one point his reputation was golden, which is why so many members here are using his modules.A: OK I was a bit confused by your first email thinking that MAXyz was in good standing on this site.
Lately, his reputation is not so good. As more and more stories emerge from members that have paid for their lasers and not received them, or have sent their lasers back for repair and not received them, people's opinions have changed. At this point, due to the utter lack of communication from Chuck, I believe most people have completely written him off.
I think most people lost touch with him around that same time period. Since then, I do not believe anyone here has heard from him.I also last heard from chuck via ebay in May 08 via ebay. He seemed very willing to help and asked me what my serial number was. It was after responding to him with the details that I never heard back.
There are alternatives coming. Mecheng 3 is working on a 660 nm replacement laser that should be available soon. It will have similar beam specs and power ratings, but be less expensive and have a better warranty. Details to follow soon.So sad because I need that darn 660 to complete my RGB projector
Longer term, several people are working on either 650nm or 635 nm solutions that should have similar beam specs. Stay tuned to PhotonLexicon for details...
Adam
I think no matter how careful you are there is still a bit of luck involved in not ruining diodes from back reflection... lol
While I do find it sad to see him fall off the way he did. I too fell off the face of the earth in a similar manner and from my experience it can be a bit overwhelming to catch back up. Regardless, I do not look down at Chuck, he really helped our side of the industry and brought a lot to the plate. Showing what could be done. The downside of running a business where as many as only two people know the 'secrets' it can be really hard when they disappear to fix modules still within warranty. And it is unfortunate. Chuck if you are still out there and possibly reading this just let it be known that we still hope the best for you and hope your back is healing. Hopefully we will hear from you again.His status has been changing lately. As of this time last year, his standing was among the best. So good, in fact, that Bridge (LaserWave representative) agreed to send him a 100 mw DPSS blue laser so he could do a long-term test-to-failure on it. (Note that we haven't had an update on that test in many months!) So at one point his reputation was golden, which is why so many members here are using his modules.
Lately, his reputation is not so good. As more and more stories emerge from members that have paid for their lasers and not received them, or have sent their lasers back for repair and not received them, people's opinions have changed. At this point, due to the utter lack of communication from Chuck, I believe most people have completely written him off.
Anyway, like I said, I disappeared, and it is strange, the photonlexicon notification emails slowly started to die off and while I didnt forget about PL, it was put on the back burner for me. The hobby I still enjoyed a bit while I was gone... unfortunately I sold some of my gear, but hopefully soon I will be back up and fully running. Hopefully my RGB will be complete and in a nice housing by this time next year.
Hopefully I didn't go too off topic here.
-Max