Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: 405nm 4-6x burner diode test

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Hemlock_mike has sent me one of these that met a premature end. Here are some phtos of the internals. You can see the pin conection arrangement clearly, as well as a shattered facet. Also it's interesting to note the z-like gold electrode on top, instead of the usual straight sliver.

    Click for larger:


    Back marking on the diode (it's laser-etched):

    Broken aperture window:

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Cupertino, California
    Posts
    2,130

    Laser Warning

    Is that a crack under the diode chip in the copper?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laser Ben View Post
    Is that a crack under the diode chip in the copper?
    If you zoom in you see it looks like a string of glue.. or.. something else

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Hmm I think that's a fiber from a piece of clothing.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, sweden
    Posts
    352

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drlava View Post
    Here's a photo of the dot at 35 feet, after it exits my workroom, turns the corner off of a first surface mirror, and lands on a black cloth down the hall. The beam starts out about 3x4mm, with most of the power in the inner 2x2mm.
    The ruler is in mm. So the collimation is pretty good.


    Sorry if thi question allready been asked.

    What type of Lens are you using for the diode?
    aizix?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    I have a strange idea.

    405nm is in the very steep edge of visibility, 410nm or even 420nm is way more visible compared to 400-405nm.

    When A diode operates at a higer temperature most of the time the wavelength gets bigger.

    Most diodes are rated for a operating temperature between 0 and 70 degrees celcius.

    Isn't it possible to use a tec in reverse and set the diode at about 60 degrees celsius to get it operating at 410nm or higher?

    this datasheet http://www.o-like.com/b2b_cpinfo.asp?id=914 even shows a high limit of 415nm!!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    2,846

    Default

    Wouldn't that be like sitting on a knife edge, at the edge of a cliff? Should, for whatever reason the thermal control circuit not 100% keep the temperature (such as varying modulation, causing temperature spikes) make the diode pop its clogs?

    Also, wouldn't the unit have a huge warm-up time?

    I see where you're coming from, but couldn't I make a 405nm diode look more like 420nm, or even 445nm by zooming it around at 12,000 mph?

    Dan

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Cupertino, California
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    In short, yes, you can greatly change the wavelength by changing the temperature. While this will make it brighter, the efficiency goes to hell when it is outside of a certain range making the diode unstable.
    CLICKY!!!

    Admin: In the immortal words of Captain Planet: YOU HAVE THE POWER
    Admin: (To quit being a bitch)

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rfourt View Post
    Sorry if thi question allready been asked.

    What type of Lens are you using for the diode?
    aizix?
    yep, that was an aixiz plastic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •