I'm just received delivery of my new projector, a Laserworld CS-400G (advertised as >300mW)
Upon setting it up 2 things have surprised me:
1. Upon firing up the ILDA test pattern at 12kpps, the scanners are showing signs of overshoot on both axis, and the circle is outside of the square on both axis, indicating not enough LF damping and perhaps too much gain
2. When sat next to my 100mW projector, the beam doesn't appear to the eye as being any brighter than my existing one. On a single point, the Laserworld unit does appear to be slightly tighter, which might explain that, however i was expecting to see a difference between the 2 (which was the reason for purchase in the first place!)
The other thing i noticed is that there is a sticker on the base saying 'Class I laser product' rather than Class 3b as i'd have expected.
So, should there be a perceptible difference between the 2 outputs or am i expecting too much of a leap?
Unfortunately i don't have a power meter to test either unit, but as Laserworld seem to be one of the more ethical companies out there, I was expecting that their outputs wouldn't be quoted based on IR as well, and would've expected IR filters in place. Is this reasonable?
I'm going to contact them regarding the scanners, as it seems stupid to return to Germany, when i could do the tuning myself, however there's a whole warranty issue then. As it is, the overshoot causes fine points to have tails which are not acceptable to me.
The ones on the left are the 20k 300mW unit, the ones on the right are 100mW 15k (scaneco15) which I've just about finished tuning. Both running at 12k