HI guys,
Good input...thank you... I'm pleased to see that way more experienced bods than me are starting to question this !!..
Its why I have struggled with the good "old" one size fits all formula being applied to the basic red, green blue thing,
Tocket... the formula I was referring to in your name was the one you assumed.. it helps heaps.
Couple that with the link that Jem posted in this thread... troll through that and at least as a "non" optical guy you can start to follow this.
Leaving the fine details to you far more knowledgeable scientists.
I am starting to lean toward leaving the 475 in and getting the 445 and letting Mr Pangolin do the work maybe ?
At least with some debate happening here I am pleased that I am not alone thinking its "all a bit strange" given what we have been told in the past.
Here is part of Jems link which shows the idea.. its all about Cones and rods etc etc..
The Color-Sensitive Cones
In 1965 came experimental confirmation of a long expected result - there are three types of color-sensitive cones in the retina of the human eye, corresponding roughly to red, green, and blue sensitive detectors.
Painstaking experiments have yielded response curves for three different kind of cones in the retina of the human eye. The "green" and "red" cones are mostly packed into the fovea centralis. By population, about 64% of the cones are red-sensitive, about 32% green sensitive, and about 2% are blue sensitive. The "blue" cones have the highest sensitivity and are mostly found outside the fovea. The shapes of the curves are obtained by measurement of the absorption by the cones, but the relative heights for the three types are set equal for lack of detailed data. There are fewer blue cones, but the blue sensitivity is comparable to the others, so there must be some boosting mechanism. In the final visual perception, the three types seem to be comparable, but the detailed process of achieving this is not known.
Anyway guys keep the flow going I would really love to understand the basics here I suspect quite a few others may need to re think matters as well.
Many thanks for your input so far..
Cheers
Ray
NZ