One of each should give you good results.![]()
One of each should give you good results.![]()
Although "brighter", I think 635 on its own is far too orange. Deep saturated colours always look better. I suppose 645 would be a good compromise, expecially as prices are dropping and you can get a reasonably tight (3mm) beam from them.
looking at that im glad i went for 635 to be honest. its alot brighter and thats what im after.
cheers everyone
2 x 10w full colour laser systems
2 x 4w full colour laser systems
2 x 3w full colour laser systems
1 450mw pinkem rgb 30k scanner
2 x 1 watt green laser
4 x 1 watt blue 445nm laser systems
3 watt rgb .
the thing that everyone is forgetting is that that picture will only indicate how the camera sees the colours NOT the ratio in terms of human vision.
Rob
If you need to ask the question 'whats so good about a laser' - you won't understand the answer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laserists do it by the nanometre.
Stanwax Laser is a Corporate Member of Ilda
Stanwax Laser main distributor of First Contact in UK - like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/FirstContactPolymerCleaner
www.photoniccleaning.co.uk
yes but it does show a comparison and that is all that really matters
cheers ollie
2 x 10w full colour laser systems
2 x 4w full colour laser systems
2 x 3w full colour laser systems
1 450mw pinkem rgb 30k scanner
2 x 1 watt green laser
4 x 1 watt blue 445nm laser systems
3 watt rgb .
It doesnt
if the camera sees 650 brighter than 635 then its not worth pants
Rob
If you need to ask the question 'whats so good about a laser' - you won't understand the answer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laserists do it by the nanometre.
Stanwax Laser is a Corporate Member of Ilda
Stanwax Laser main distributor of First Contact in UK - like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/FirstContactPolymerCleaner
www.photoniccleaning.co.uk
yes but we all know 650 is darker than 635 and thats what the picture shows. the only way we can really know is by looking at it live but we cant do that so the picture is as close as we can get.
personally i think its how it would look if you were there but the only person that really knows that is the person who took the picture.
if anyone knows who took it then could they ask them to advise if this is an acurate picture
cheers
2 x 10w full colour laser systems
2 x 4w full colour laser systems
2 x 3w full colour laser systems
1 450mw pinkem rgb 30k scanner
2 x 1 watt green laser
4 x 1 watt blue 445nm laser systems
3 watt rgb .
so look at my pic - which is the longer wavelength?
is the left hand one lower power or longer wavelength does the colour really show a difference - are they the same? - my point is its what the camera shows isnt really a true representation of the visiblity or the colour.
Rob
If you need to ask the question 'whats so good about a laser' - you won't understand the answer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Laserists do it by the nanometre.
Stanwax Laser is a Corporate Member of Ilda
Stanwax Laser main distributor of First Contact in UK - like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/FirstContactPolymerCleaner
www.photoniccleaning.co.uk