Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: ScanPro20 + USB Soundcard + Spaghetti Troubles!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wallasey, Wirral, UK
    Posts
    146

    Exclamation ScanPro20 + USB Soundcard + Spaghetti Troubles!

    I am having some trouble with my ScanPro20's and Soundcard DAC, I there seems to be gaps in the lines

    Here is the ILDA Test Pattern from Spaghetti

    and also a couple of shots from RockConcert spaghetti show

    If you look at the ILDA test pattern it doesnt look too bad, but the square in the center is not joined on the left side....!

    Any Idea's ?

    Cheers, Sean










  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Eugene Oregon
    Posts
    952

    Default

    how far away is your scanner? can you figure out the angle your projecting the test pattern? and at what speed?

    it is probably to much for the scanners causing it to overshoot on the square.

    as for the lines going to far past the squares in the picture you can adjust the "hold" setting in spaghetti..

    try the blanking hold option first and that should get thos lines to go away and the gaps to close.
    -Josh

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Native Floridian
    Posts
    3,128

    Default

    Not sure why the square isn't coming together properly on the side there. IF the scanners are properly tuned for 20K, then you're scanning a bit too slow, which is why the circle is outside the square. You also need to adjust blanking shift. If you look at the top line that I have circled, then compair it to one of my pics, you'll see that blanking shift should be adjusted.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 1.jpg  

    2.jpg  


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,147,489,459

    Cool

    DZ nailed it. The color shift is wrong. That's why the vertical line on the square isn't meeting at the corner like it should. (It's also why the lines at the top of the pattern are wrong, and why the "ground symbol" at the bottom is shifted to the side.)

    The scanners also appear to need a little tuning (or as DZ mentioned, they're running slow), but that's *not* what's causing the problem with the line on the square...

    Suggest you contact Gary via his google-group for Spaghetti (or via E-mail) and ask him how to adjust the color speed offset.

    Adam

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Eugene Oregon
    Posts
    952

    Default

    as said above you can go into the scanner settings and change the "hold" settings.

    it will be the 3 options on the left.
    -Josh

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wallasey, Wirral, UK
    Posts
    146

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by buffo View Post
    DZ nailed it. The color shift is wrong. That's why the vertical line on the square isn't meeting at the corner like it should. (It's also why the lines at the top of the pattern are wrong, and why the "ground symbol" at the bottom is shifted to the side.)

    The scanners also appear to need a little tuning (or as DZ mentioned, they're running slow), but that's *not* what's causing the problem with the line on the square...

    Suggest you contact Gary via his google-group for Spaghetti (or via E-mail) and ask him how to adjust the color speed offset.

    Adam
    I have tried re-tuning them, I think i have made things worse to be honist. I followed your guide adam, But i dont think i am getting a clean enough singal from my soundcard DAC, this caused me a few problems during tuning. I think i am gonna have to get a real DAC before i continue.

    I am running the scanners at 20k in spaghetti.


    Quote Originally Posted by thesk8nmidget View Post
    as said above you can go into the scanner settings and change the "hold" settings.

    it will be the 3 options on the left.
    I have tried these setting before and after re-tuning but i they didnt seem to make a difference

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    1 hr from everything in SoCal
    Posts
    2,770

    Default

    You could also try running the test pattern through LaserBoy. You will have to turn off the optomization feature. You can change the blanking timing in LaserBoy to match the speed of your scanners. James put it to me like this, and this is your problem, blanking using modulation or a PCAOM is instantanious compared to a moving galvo. The signal to the glavo is instant, but the galvo has to accelerate, slow down, stop and accelerate again. The inertia involved makes the glavos slow compared to TTL or analog modulation or a PCAOM. So you have to dumb down the blanking to the scanners' speed.
    If you're the smartest person in the room, then you're in the wrong room.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seanharrison View Post
    I have tried re-tuning them, I think i have made things worse to be honist. I followed your guide adam, But i dont think i am getting a clean enough singal from my soundcard DAC, this caused me a few problems during tuning. I think i am gonna have to get a real DAC before i continue.

    I am running the scanners at 20k in spaghetti.
    Can you descibe what about the signal isn't 'clean'? I've tuned using sound card DACs before with good results, so don't think it's something with the sound card dac concept that is causing you trouble, maybe there is an issue with your implementation?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,754

    Talking

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Don't get a "real" DAC!

    You just need to get the timing right!

    Do you know about all the stuff in LaserBoy menu 'b' ???

    If you option '4' set desired LaserBoy wave sample offsets to something like...

    7
    7
    0
    0
    0
    0

    X & Y are logically tied together and set as one value. R, G, B, and I can be set individually.

    Then option '5' apply offsets to LaserBoy wave, you will modify whatever wave file you select such that the x and y signals to you scanners will be sent out 7 samples before the color channels.

    You might find this to be just what you need!

    James.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Wallasey, Wirral, UK
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drlava View Post
    Can you descibe what about the signal isn't 'clean'? I've tuned using sound card DACs before with good results, so don't think it's something with the sound card dac concept that is causing you trouble, maybe there is an issue with your implementation?
    The signal seems to drop out sometimes leaving half the image, this sometimes causes the blanking to stop responding. I am thinking this is an issue with the Windows Vista drivers, because it does not seem to do it with XP

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •