Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: 70% Power Loss Through Scanner Mirrors....

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,411

    Default

    Last time I had such big loss after scanners mirrors only on one laser (it was with my green, red and blue was fine), it was just an IR issue. My green was simply outputting some IR that the scanners mirrors wasn't reflecting. Maybe you should check this

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    Do the losses change by changing the angle of the mirrors, or are the losses consistent all over your scanfield?

    How did you clean your mirrors? Maybe you have stripped some essential coating.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    449

    Default

    Have you tried turning the galvos around 180 degrees... so that the other side of the galvo mirror is used instead?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    2,098

    Default

    I also had Laserword mirrors, they are bad (20% loss on the mirrors in my projector) If you replace them with ither mirrors you can also reach higher scanspeeds and a cleaner image.

    But still 70% is unreal so I think your 240mW blue is putting out 100mW blue and 140mW IR

    Please measure your laser again with a IR filter in fron of the detector.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    291

    Default

    humz thats strange i have those scanners here
    im only seeing loses of about 2-4 % max for all 3 colors

    also my 100 mw cni also does not have a ir filter installed or a very poor one
    im measuring about 210 mw after warmup and with an external ir filer about 110 mw
    same for my 200 mw laserwave 340 without external filter 220 mw with
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye
    Need laser repair contact me !!!!!!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    7,067

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by Xytrell View Post
    Have you tried turning the galvos around 180 degrees... so that the other side of the galvo mirror is used instead?
    Yea, check this; make sure you are using the first surface side. I done it wong befo meself...

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI.
    Posts
    2,704

    Default

    Thanks for the suggestions guys. I did check the laser with a high quality IR filter and I only get a 30mW decrease in output power. After all, It is a Laser-Wave module and they come with IR filters installed.

    I clean the scanner mirrors with 99% isopropyl so that shouldn't remove any coatings. The mirrors are definately positioned correctly, front surface pointing out. And yes, the loss is fairly consistant with different scanner mirror angles. I think I'll try changing my mirrors to the replacements provided with the LW-50K scanner kit. Maybe that will help.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 300EVIL View Post
    After all, It is a Laser-Wave module and they come with IR filters installed.
    Precisely not There's just some coating on the optics to prevent IR emission at maximum, but not a real IR filter. So there's still a consequent amount of IR coming out of your laser. I clearly noticed this on mine.

    A thing you can do if you have access to a relatively good microscope, is looking at the mirrors under a 10-50x magnification. On my mirrors, I saw some serious oxydation or crap all the way on the mirror surface, which I didn't see to the naked eye.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Lake Geneva, WI.
    Posts
    2,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbk View Post
    Precisely not There's just some coating on the optics to prevent IR emission at maximum, but not a real IR filter. So there's still a consequent amount of IR coming out of your laser. I clearly noticed this on mine.
    Okay, so it may be just a coating not a separate filter optic. But we are talking 30mW not 170mW.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,411

    Default

    Yep, in your case there's certainly another major problem.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •