Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Question about modulated driver idea

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default Question about modulated driver idea

    I've been mulling over this idea for awhile, mostly for TTL modulation, and now that the lasorb is available I think it might be possible, but I'd like any feedback from the great minds here..

    Most people are familiar with the common LM317 current regulation circuit used as a simple laser diode driver.

    I've been formulating a simple way to modulate the circuit, but so far the results have allowed for very limited modulation speed due to the protection capacitor across the diode.

    In a standard LM317 current regulation circuit it is possible to modulate using the adj. pin. If a lasorb was used instead of the filter capacitor, would the modulation speed increase enough to be a viable modulation circuit or would the LM317 circuitry itself still limit modulation speed too much for show use? That's my question.

    By my logic, using a circuit like this even analog modulation would be possible. Is my logic accurate in this regard?

    I obviously haven't built such a circuit yet, but I'd like to know what you guys think..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,009

    Default

    An LM317 just does not regulate that fast ... I mean sure you could make it work to some extent, but it doesn't cost much more to build a decent driver so why bother

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    An excellent point, although now I wonder just what the rise-fall time is on an LM317 (time to bust out the 'scope)..

    More than a cost issue, it is a simplicity issue. I was thinking "it couldn't be that easy".. and it's probably not. Depending on any extra parts that are needed, it seems that it could work but you might end up putting just as much into that as you would another, better design. On the other hand if it were that easy, it would probably be beneficial to someone somewhere..

  4. #4
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElektroFreak View Post
    An excellent point, although now I wonder just what the rise-fall time is on an LM317 (time to bust out the 'scope)..

    More than a cost issue, it is a simplicity issue. I was thinking "it couldn't be that easy".. and it's probably not. Depending on any extra parts that are needed, it seems that it could work but you might end up putting just as much into that as you would another, better design. On the other hand if it were that easy, it would probably be beneficial to someone somewhere..

    The problem with 317 is if the potentiometer wiper lifts during tuning it surges to full current. This is well documented both in Sam's FAQ and Winfield Hill's book "The Art of Electronics".

    There is a way around this by using a parallel resistor across the adjust pot.

    As for the 317 being slow:

    SEE:

    http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/tx/317-tx.htm

    Just kidding with ya, but many people have made 317 audio amplifers.



    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    If I were introducing a modulation signal on the adjust pin rather than using a pot would the issue still occur with the LM317 surging to max current? I would think it wouldn't but I'm not really sure. I can't remember ever hearing before that someone had directly modulated the adj. pin to vary the LM317 output. If the thing will handle audio frequencies, then it should definitely be able to handle high-speed laser modulation. Using a transistor connected to the adjust pin would actually be the way to go. Obviously can't put 5V to the adj. pin, but if a transistor was used in the adjust portion of the circuit then a low voltage modulation signal could be applied to it.. I guess I'll have to try to put something together and see how it goes.
    Last edited by ElektroFreak; 08-10-2009 at 18:58.

  6. #6
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElektroFreak View Post
    If I were introducing a modulation signal on the adjust pin rather than using a pot would the issue still occur with the LM317 surging to max current? I would think it wouldn't but I'm not really sure. I can't remember ever hearing before that someone had directly modulated the adj. pin to vary the LM317 output. If the thing will handle audio frequencies, then it should definitely be able to handle high-speed laser modulation. Using a transistor connected to the adjust pin would actually be the way to go. Obviously can't put 5V to the adj. pin, but if a transistor was used in the adjust portion of the circuit then a low voltage modulation signal could be applied to it.. I guess I'll have to try to put something together and see how it goes.

    SEE this:

    http://www.circuit-projects.com/misc...-by-lm317.html

    as you sink more and more current out of the adj pin, the Vout goes up. You'd need some means on limiting the drive from the 317 and some bias on the transistor.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  7. #7
    mixedgas's Avatar
    mixedgas is offline Creaky Old Award Winning Bastard Technologist
    Infinitus Excellentia Ion Laser Dominatus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A lab with some dripping water on the floor.
    Posts
    10,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mixedgas View Post
    SEE this:

    http://www.circuit-projects.com/misc...-by-lm317.html

    as you sink more and more current out of the adj pin, the Vout goes up. You'd need some means on limiting the drive from the 317 and some bias on the transistor.

    Steve
    two 317s in series? one as max current and the other as the modulator? wierd idea but I've seen worse.

    Steve
    Qui habet Christos, habet Vitam!
    I should have rented the space under my name for advertising.
    When I still could have...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    Sounds like it would work.. I'll have to see what I can work up in the way of a schematic..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,342

    Default

    Here's a high speed shunt style driver I posted around a 317:
    http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...ghlight=driver

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,622

    Default

    Nice! Thanks....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •