Can anyone explain: Why sltvm2007 is banned???

[mechath]

Admin should explain, why sltvm2007 is banned???

[allthatwhichis]

http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...ead.php?t=7629



I think he was violating #1.00 and 5.00 was realized.

[Laserman532]

Admin should explain, why sltvm2007 is banned???

Was He Banned??? THATS OUTRAGEOUS!!!! He should have been flogged with a fiber optical bundle, not banned. I am NOT a fan of banning ANYONE!!! I far prefer public humiliation! He was only making himself look like an idiot.

hhhhmmmmm mechath...post -1???

[soforene]

Admin should explain, why sltvm2007 is banned???

Why?
I'm guessing You are he and as such you should be banned again.
Tit.

[mechath]

Why?
I'm guessing You are he and as such you should be banned again.
Tit.

Oh, you scared me!
You must be the ADMIN.

[Doc]

Oh, you scared me!
You must be the ADMIN.

I think the only way to gain any respect in this forum is to do as all of the other members do. That is to share details, theories and results of your experiments, not to simply show vauge images of your results.

This is not some childrens playgound, it is full of some very clever, honerable and intellectual people, many of whom have spent most of their lives working with lasers and or electronics, that could without doubt help you with your project. But you seem hell bent on playing childish "not telling" guessing games.

With intelligence and maturity comes intolerence for time wasting, your posts contained nothing but photos of some scanned images, nothing more.

I could post an image of a car and tell everybody that I've made it run on water. Simply posting more pictures of the car driving down a road when asked for details is a worthless waste of time, and would soon have members doubting what I'd written.

We then arrive back at paragraph 2; you are wasting the time of the the people that could and would have gladly helped. These people provide help to hobbyists and professional alike for no financial gain. This is both disrespectful and rude, and as you now probably know; won't be tolerated for very long.

Ian

[mixedgas]

For your information:

http://www.gs-scanners.com/resonants.../27-index.html

16 Khz is achieved using two parallel beams on a 8 khz video CRS and the driver outputs a linearized pixel clock and directly accepts video sync. They make them to beyond 20 khz.

I have GSIs published paper on how the linearizing works. And I have one on my desk, sans driver.


And perhaps because the 5 main accepted ethical academic options on disclosing new technology are:

1. Openly publish in a peer reviewed manner and be credited with your work,this often results in more funding of your work.
2. Patent or Copyright your work and attempt to sell it.
3. Decide its too dangerous to be published, contact the government and make them aware of the danger you have found.
4. Do nothing and say nothing, it dies with you.
5. If not sure, review above items 1 to 4.

It is ethically not acceptable to shout "hey I've got this neat new thing" and then not do 1 or 2.


Steve

[Admin]

Admin should explain, why sltvm2007 is banned???

I should? Wait... I should!

http://www.photonlexicon.com/forums/...ead.php?t=7629

Yep, Usr.sltvm2007 was determined to be in violation of 1.0.0 by "Janitorial Services" as afforded to them by 3.0.0. More specifically Usr.sltvm2007 was in violation of 3.1.0 because of the blatant disregard of 1.0.0 and failure to understand 3.2.3 *as explained* by the entire 3.0 heirarchy. This subsequently bothered "Janitorial Services" as allowed under the heading of 4.0.0 to wit 4.1.0. This was all brought to the attention of "Janitorial Services" by way of 5.0.0 which logically led to the necessity of 6.0.0 and having been determined to be of no consequence to the awesome members of PL and would "go one further" in the desire to remove the underlying necessity of 0.0.0 and the entire PL.COE, 7.0.0 was rendered a non issue thus facilitating the usage of tools afforded to them in 4.0.0 in their sole discretion as afforded to them 3.0.0. Since 9.1.0 was not in effect 9.0.0 did not need to be called and... Fuck it, You are an ass-hat.

Now, That having been said It is my intention to show the court that I have no personal bias. This shall be enumerated and proven by attached pictorial evidence that you are in violation of 8.0.0 thus warranting the expressed reassessment of 4.0.0 and subsequent usage of the tools there-in. Don't worry though, It's a slow nuke. You should have more than adequate time to respond.

Was He Banned??? THATS OUTRAGEOUS!!!! He should have been flogged with a fiber optical bundle, not banned. I am NOT a fan of banning ANYONE!!! I far prefer public humiliation! He was only making himself look like an idiot.

Well, if it so pleases the court it should now be evident that there was both a banning of said user *and* public humiliation. A fair compromise, no?

Why?
I'm guessing You are he and as such you should be banned again.
Tit.

Internet paranoia is much better than real life paranoia due to the fact that one can keep accurate and complete logs for the sake of verification.

Oh, you scared me!
You must be the ADMIN.

He is not. I am. You will notice that I am far less humorous and entertaining than our resident avatar-warlord-ninja, Soforene. Though please note my psychologically-deficient-multiple-personality-having-friend that we both offer good advice. His, I believe, is: "Shut the fuck up." Mine is "Should have used a proxy."

I think the only way to gain any respect in this forum is to do as all of the other members do. That is to share details, theories and results of your experiments, not to simply show vauge images of your results.

EXACTLY RIGHT. Look, you came up with something, thats neat! I would sure love to know more about it! Who knows what we as a *community* know that might be able to help you! Wait... No details... Just a insistence on keeping everyone guessing as if you are trying to protect supposedly valuable un-patented intellectual property from the thieves on the Insta-blag-net-o-sphere while trolling for an investor.

Seriously... Even if your "invention" is better than sliced bread or the fabled sliced bread slicing machine or *even* the machine that makes that machine it should not be construed as an excuse to treat the very people who replied with curiosity as morons.

[soforene]

Behold, the curtain draws back and we once more see the mysterious figure pulling levers and pushing buttons, enveloped within a cloud of ethereal mist...........

Now that's scary.

[Laserman532]

just to keep me laughing, please toss up gothasaurous!