Whitelight, I understand your caution but it seems to play the wrong way. An artist bumped into or stepped on that laser, allegedly. No matter what the measurements were beforehand, all bets are off because there's no assessing the optical condition without careful observation and repeat testing. That takes time that no-one has in the circumstances. Once a laser gets whacked, it's best to assume it's unsafe.
This is one reason I proposed an accelerometer. This isn't just to stop an unsafe laser, it can cut both ways. Suppose the clinometer detects no tilt, and the accelerometer registers a G-force known to be well within specs measured for that laser system as a whole... In this specific case you might be ok to trust the laser, so it makes sense for the thing not to get triggered off. But how many people actually bash their lasers to test for this stuff? If they want the show to go on, they're going to have to do it because the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Hopefully if optics mounts are solid enough they'll only have to do it once and not have to miserably repeat the test just to be sure.
I really do think of this stuff, always did. It's why I do things slowly (apart from not havign much money to go fast either), and right now I'm waiting to buy some TEC's to see what kind of methods I'll use. The cheap way is to get a bigger TEC to spread physical load of shocks to it, and pass more heat easily to the case. But TEC's are weak in shear, so this might turn out bad. And the only way I'll really know is to clobber one because if I don't, and I sell any, I'll soon learn the weakness the hard way.
If people don't want to prove ratings against such shock then they'll have to make absolute restrictions that their devices are not in reach of a person dancing on a stage. To give those people more freedom likely costs more than everyone else wants to spend. So in practise the only way is to assume that there are too many unknowns after an impact, so there is no reason to assume its safe if that ever happens. Whenever I see any widget or gadget in the RS catalogue that has been specified for high resistance to shock, dust, water, fire, explosion, the cost is always very high. As far as I know, very little stage gear is rated like that, it's why people rely on solid gantries and flight cases. And the toughest bit of stage gear I ever saw was a passive foldback monitor, cos those tend to get stepped on a lot.